)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":7730,"name":"Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui","email":"sahid.ferdjaoui@industrialdiscipline.com","username":"sahid"},"change_message_id":"d940ac91642478eddea2372568dc188f9ce52a13","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4171c2c2_ea0812ee","updated":"2025-02-13 15:41:53.000000000","message":"To let Sean aware of the change.","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"bd4494a1d3db5ad6b3e70456daffe2b141a89d41","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6b9e065c_5c4b083e","updated":"2025-02-13 16:38:22.000000000","message":"i recall the mailing list dicussion.\nif we are removing the job then we shoudl also be removing the plugin in the same patch\n\nwe do not carry plugings in tree for out of tree neutron ml2/dirvers\nso if linux bridge has been removed form the neutron treee the os-vif plugin should also be removed.","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"fbc323937aed8f1a190265715a3285df9833fc13","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d321bbde_cc9d1e8e","updated":"2025-02-18 11:45:32.000000000","message":"i will loop back to this after the nova irc meeting today and appove if we agree on the direction","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":8313,"name":"Lajos Katona","display_name":"lajoskatona","email":"katonalala@gmail.com","username":"elajkat","status":"Ericsson Software Technology"},"change_message_id":"beb068cbab8316b149816f1cca46a9974045161b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6b89e765_1e1a8f5b","updated":"2025-02-14 08:34:43.000000000","message":"right, let\u0027s discuss this with the Nova team","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"4d6bf41febd28329c869b9b4cc1703e827ede3a4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ec659783_80c6a154","updated":"2025-02-18 21:15:19.000000000","message":"we agreed to disable the testing and deprecate this cycle in the nova irc meethign today so ill apporve this to unblock ci\n\nlest try and merge th peding patchs tomorrow and then do a release of os-vif","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":7730,"name":"Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui","email":"sahid.ferdjaoui@industrialdiscipline.com","username":"sahid"},"change_message_id":"cc46072ac7c360bfc495de6be306b8ee39e36d02","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6ca060c6_14ad2c6b","in_reply_to":"25a6bba0_7c2cb565","updated":"2025-02-13 17:14:30.000000000","message":"That makes sense Sean. The point here is I guess to do not block the CI of osvif but if you can make progress on the removal in same time of removing the CI part that would be really great for sure","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"374509b29446ef698300499e8af9dd238fffc9fe","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"25a6bba0_7c2cb565","in_reply_to":"6b9e065c_5c4b083e","updated":"2025-02-13 16:41:34.000000000","message":"basically we need to delete \nhttps://github.com/openstack/os-vif/tree/master/vif_plug_linux_bridge\nand remove it form here\nhttps://github.com/openstack/os-vif/blob/master/setup.cfg#L33 as well.\n\nwe will alos have some work to do in nova\n\nnamely removing the neutron-linuxbridge-tempest job for novas check pipeline\n\nhttps://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L788-L794\n\ni can go propose that now","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"56d32d850286282ea0a90d5c335ef28eab5f8386","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ddf7761d_1c735d6a","in_reply_to":"6ca060c6_14ad2c6b","updated":"2025-02-13 17:56:34.000000000","message":"so the non clinet lib freeze is next week.\nI\u0027ll discuss this with the nova team.\nfor now lets leave this patch as it is and ill prepare some patches to do the removeal.\n\nwhat we are going to likely do is keep the code for the plugin and supprot in nova for 2025.1 with no testing. that would mean if you had 2025.1 nova wiht 2024.2 or older neutron it woulud work\n\nand early next cycle we will start removing the supprot\n\nmarking somethign as experimental si not the saem as formally deprecateding supprot in a release note published in the previous slurp releas.e\n\nthat actually want we are meant to od when removing features.\n\nso nova will formally deprecate linux bridge supprot this cycle and remove supprot next cycle is the rest of the core team agree with that plan.\n\nill prepare patches to do that and add a follow up path to this to do the code removal","commit_id":"091f41f261a5bae92562229f25417e15c8fcf5e2"}]}