)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"ef97b648671fabc3d091c27605cc9b3f0aff4175","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"08611bd5_2f05de9e","updated":"2025-11-17 09:54:15.000000000","message":"LGTM. I really prefer this approach than the one I proposed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.messaging/+/960377\n\nSo, concerning the exchange limit topic, I propose to continue with this patch and I propose to abandon my initial patch.","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"},{"author":{"_account_id":31245,"name":"Daniel Bengtsson","email":"dbengt@redhat.com","username":"damani42"},"change_message_id":"f8d16cf3043a0be1c854995b2f6700f2d2cbe472","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8c1c1c20_931a6edd","updated":"2025-11-17 09:53:13.000000000","message":"This change makes sense. The previous logic was matching all\nPreconditionFailed errors, so restricting the fallback to the durable\nmismatch case is the right fix. Looks good to merge.\n\nWe might just want to add a small release note since this restores the\nprevious behavior and fixes a regression.","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"85565dc8a7041d19bbe842a3cbb7a08ea34c3ef2","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e8ecd8d1_17b7c5b7","updated":"2025-11-17 10:08:02.000000000","message":"This smells like a real bug. Let me open a bug and link this change to it so that we can manage backport.","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"7b6304bb9658cf46c9b371e6c7e03ea48157332d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"743eb942_dcb4353e","in_reply_to":"08611bd5_2f05de9e","updated":"2025-11-17 10:36:09.000000000","message":"+1","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"7b6304bb9658cf46c9b371e6c7e03ea48157332d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9d49bb2f_336a96b4","in_reply_to":"8c1c1c20_931a6edd","updated":"2025-11-17 10:36:09.000000000","message":"Added a release note. Also created a bug so that backport can be tracked (and justified) properly.","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"7b6304bb9658cf46c9b371e6c7e03ea48157332d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4ba1bb19_a2fc520e","in_reply_to":"e8ecd8d1_17b7c5b7","updated":"2025-11-17 10:36:09.000000000","message":"Done.","commit_id":"e1d8352547328bd855e0d815ea320e144d100a3a"}]}