)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"95589dc01d8e8ce8f72a615984d324b54c2ccff4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"14f3e3f5_fae35021","updated":"2024-03-21 01:00:04.000000000","message":"OK I wasn\u0027t aware further older branches are broken... I agree we can backport this to fix CI and that is the simplest solution.\n\nI\u0027m doing fast-approval because this is a clean cherry pick and affects only unit tests.","commit_id":"51e639fd78d6dab7f4b1f14ef961e680c8a28350"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"1f996ec07f0ca618496d9c489fa77a8c01086742","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e16d84a0_9519a533","updated":"2024-03-20 12:46:24.000000000","message":"This patch fixes a gate issue as py310 on stable/2023.2 (and py39 on former branches) started to fail [1] with missing pytz error [2]. This is failing only on newer python versions as some dependency installs pytz version for older (\u003cpy39) python versions.\n\nA simple solution is to add pytz to test-requirements.txt, but since this is test code only and this fix does not require any new package to be installed, let\u0027s just backport this one.\n\n[1] https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name\u003dopenstack-tox-py310\u0026project\u003dopenstack%2Foslo.versionedobjects\u0026branch\u003dstable%2F2023.2\u0026skip\u003d0\n[2] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named \u0027pytz\u0027","commit_id":"51e639fd78d6dab7f4b1f14ef961e680c8a28350"}]}
