)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"9de068100cedb99e38a0f0231c6f3e61ced953be","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"As this one is the real only one that allow us to evaluate a"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"complete end2end on the ovn-provider, let us activate as"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"voting job."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Change-Id: I5c770ab1c293dc0a3b607dd5464d026a1629f71f"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"24a7924d_cd985931","line":11,"updated":"2024-05-13 19:40:57.000000000","message":"I have two questions / concerns:\n\n1. what\u0027s the story behind having kuryr-k8s in both openshift and opendev organizations? Which one is the \"official\" place for new changes?\n\n2. You now tie the gate of octavia ovn provider against kuryr-k8s and kuryr-tempest-plugin repos. But I don\u0027t see this job validated in these repos. Is it a concern? Should they at least have non-voting jobs in their CI pipelines?","commit_id":"9ffd9e9f0d17ecd323f7a1d2c8300992ca87faec"},{"author":{"_account_id":23567,"name":"Luis Tomas Bolivar","email":"ltomasbo@redhat.com","username":"ltomasbo"},"change_message_id":"34ae54cf4e828faecbce5b7202e1453a3e37f6b7","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"As this one is the real only one that allow us to evaluate a"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"complete end2end on the ovn-provider, let us activate as"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"voting job."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Change-Id: I5c770ab1c293dc0a3b607dd5464d026a1629f71f"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"b8a80c1b_f302dac9","line":11,"in_reply_to":"24a7924d_cd985931","updated":"2024-05-14 06:45:23.000000000","message":"Regarding the first, kuryr was born as an openstack proyect, and the code at opendev is the upstream/base one. Then, Red Hat has its \"midstream/downstream\" version at openshift organization as Red Hat is shipping it tight it to the OpenShift releases instead of the OpenStack releases.\n\nRegarding the second: For historical reason, Kuryr was one of the components that uses ovn-octavia and allowed to test different capabilites of ovn-octavia and find out a lot of bugs, race conditions and such. So it was a great addition to quickly detect regresions","commit_id":"9ffd9e9f0d17ecd323f7a1d2c8300992ca87faec"},{"author":{"_account_id":23567,"name":"Luis Tomas Bolivar","email":"ltomasbo@redhat.com","username":"ltomasbo"},"change_message_id":"aaaacc558e60cc48335583e26e4862547b778dc8","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"As this one is the real only one that allow us to evaluate a"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"complete end2end on the ovn-provider, let us activate as"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"voting job."},{"line_number":12,"context_line":""},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"Change-Id: I5c770ab1c293dc0a3b607dd5464d026a1629f71f"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"dfab11fa_1f340726","line":11,"in_reply_to":"b8a80c1b_f302dac9","updated":"2024-05-14 06:48:08.000000000","message":"And also to add in the second, the tempest coverage depending on octavia is very limited for ovn-octavia due to the differences in features (L7 vs L4) and therefore most of the tests are skipped. So this was one great option to easily test different features of ovn-octavia, as a simple command in k8s will generate loadbalancer(s) with pools, listeners, members, different protocols, different security groups, ...","commit_id":"9ffd9e9f0d17ecd323f7a1d2c8300992ca87faec"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"af6d04f22b9c6e6f23a325708053ffce3c74ba73","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"349521a9_38981cbe","updated":"2024-05-13 19:42:00.000000000","message":"(I think this patch has no reason to depend on the other patches in the chain.)","commit_id":"9ffd9e9f0d17ecd323f7a1d2c8300992ca87faec"},{"author":{"_account_id":34451,"name":"Fernando Royo","email":"froyo@redhat.com","username":"froyo"},"change_message_id":"f11151f3cfabd03f76fed616136c32271cd13b6a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"6be230e1_1dd4d906","in_reply_to":"349521a9_38981cbe","updated":"2024-05-16 07:31:04.000000000","message":"totally agree, it appeared there because it was made in the same branch where the previous one worked. broken chain!","commit_id":"9ffd9e9f0d17ecd323f7a1d2c8300992ca87faec"},{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"b246fb6132a5eee791bb4203300c28808194371b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"16c0b915_5aaaf07d","updated":"2024-05-14 13:38:52.000000000","message":"I think it\u0027s fine; but I would still suggest to follow up with adding the job (non-voting?) to kuryr-k8s pipeline.","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"},{"author":{"_account_id":8655,"name":"Jakub Libosvar","email":"libosvar@redhat.com","username":"jlibosva"},"change_message_id":"1e243e3bee5475a4738cd298d6a51a989fd4d00a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"205d543d_b06a98a7","updated":"2024-05-15 20:26:57.000000000","message":"Is this really something we want to do? Kuryr seems to become Inactive https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/916945 so maybe we should discuss if voting on a non-maintained project is a good way forward.","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"b8684fee2c46c5fc22d7e989c61844bde5981ffa","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"1a48b62d_1a2cde07","updated":"2026-05-13 08:55:43.000000000","message":"The kuryr-kubernetes project was already retired so I think this should be abandoned now.","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"},{"author":{"_account_id":34451,"name":"Fernando Royo","email":"froyo@redhat.com","username":"froyo"},"change_message_id":"f11151f3cfabd03f76fed616136c32271cd13b6a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"2d28e6e9_60a1c0aa","in_reply_to":"205d543d_b06a98a7","updated":"2024-05-16 07:31:04.000000000","message":"As long as the job keeps validating ovn-octavia-provider e2e, and doesn\u0027t break itself I see it as a good option until there is a better tempest to cover us (or a new specific tempest job)","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"},{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"b8828316149259503c21baf7b9033854123bbaa1","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"df81be7e_c4dbeeb1","in_reply_to":"2d28e6e9_60a1c0aa","updated":"2024-05-16 23:51:58.000000000","message":"Was a bug to extend octavia tempest plugin coverage to render this voting job unneeded reported somewhere?","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"},{"author":{"_account_id":34451,"name":"Fernando Royo","email":"froyo@redhat.com","username":"froyo"},"change_message_id":"055d7819ea4911db0a78cac4f613226ae4f3a93d","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"f7384543_36231f1c","in_reply_to":"df81be7e_c4dbeeb1","updated":"2024-05-17 09:10:20.000000000","message":"not u/s, but rather internally identifying the tests that should be modified so that they don\u0027t have to be skipped.\n\nAlso several fixes was sent in the past in order to give more coverage to ovn-provider, but they ended up in a forgotten drawer\n\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/849028\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/octavia-tempest-plugin/+/870824","commit_id":"870c37993000787e9a4d5960b7e2520bdbfbcaa0"}]}