)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"5c6d81545176aa1b57118a042ff56e5910583918","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"11e7f541_3b9a3784","updated":"2022-09-02 11:15:56.000000000","message":"+2 while i check if we can stil mege this if so ill add +w otherwise it will need to wait until after RC1","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"4ef88bcbbd81e5999cb4e586fa8fc52c44dc8e5b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"87ea062c_53338ce9","updated":"2022-07-11 12:11:44.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t think we can do this. This is a breaking API change and as far as I can tell, the previous case would not result in a HTTP 5xx (meaning we can\u0027t fix it on that criteria). I\u0027m guessing we should just drop the field with the typo for now and optionally add a new microversion disallowing this later (fwiw, I don\u0027t think this is a big enough deal to warrant a new microversion)","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"},{"author":{"_account_id":7634,"name":"Takashi Natsume","email":"takanattie@gmail.com","username":"natsumet"},"change_message_id":"97f2abd465b00c9f959deb911413e55ce6ed0020","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9ee358ab_82b8c876","updated":"2022-07-18 01:02:39.000000000","message":"LGTM","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"},{"author":{"_account_id":9708,"name":"Balazs Gibizer","display_name":"gibi","email":"gibizer@gmail.com","username":"gibi"},"change_message_id":"5bac4e0ad7db4959befd49471d0d2032114d6960","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b0aef313_811f55d9","updated":"2022-07-11 12:25:55.000000000","message":"Make sense. The value of the \"mappings\" field in the allocation request is actually ignored by placement. It is there only to allow using an candidate from the GET allocation_candidates query directly for POST /allocations. The mappings is generated by placement during the a_c query and consumed by the client (nova).","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"},{"author":{"_account_id":7634,"name":"Takashi Natsume","email":"takanattie@gmail.com","username":"natsumet"},"change_message_id":"8f848383a16b1efca5a610e081a74e51c499ad03","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9ffae419_e97a7b47","updated":"2022-09-02 13:52:49.000000000","message":"recheck timeout","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"d47da2ac80805e132b3ff200410bb01af6d780ea","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"92d6ca21_c8782d6c","updated":"2022-09-02 11:54:49.000000000","message":"talking to gibi we think its ok to proceed.\n\nwe noted on irc that this does not have a bug attach to it but it is a bug.\n\n","commit_id":"7d4d49f41c83ae6af52dd52f71f2fd553683afcc"}]}