)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"493e99385ba40431c4f75813cb53ec9d101574b4","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":10,"context_line":"existing WSGI application using oslo_service.asgi.wrap_wsgi(). This"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"enables serving the Placement API under modern ASGI servers such as"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Hypercorn while preserving all middleware, authentication, and API"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"behavior unchanged."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":""},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"Usage:"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"  $ hypercorn placement.asgi.api:application --bind 0.0.0.0:8778"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":5,"id":"b0674e1c_08aa01b0","line":13,"updated":"2026-08-26 15:53:23.000000000","message":"in this form its proably ok, that is not a feature that was planned or approved for this cycle so this is not someitn im intending to +2 for 2026.2\n\nwe need to alks about this as a team as we currenly do not plan ot use asyncio in nova or placment\n\nthat might change from 2027.2 once event is finally removed\n\n\ni think the minima ASGI wrapper strigs a pargmatic blance for now\ngiven placement has never used evently but the same propsal would not be accpated in nova today.","commit_id":"ce8980c3e4d7af7134b9c939025ff0cd021328e2"}],"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"493e99385ba40431c4f75813cb53ec9d101574b4","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"1c7531c3_5809d10c","updated":"2026-08-26 15:53:23.000000000","message":"-1 just because this is a new feature that should have been dicussed and approved in the nova irc meeting as a specless blueprint before doing it\n\ni dont feel comforable with doing this now 2 days before FF\n\nbut i dont really have an issue with this in general provide we build concentios and get agreement for how we will test this in ci next cycle(2027.1).","commit_id":"ce8980c3e4d7af7134b9c939025ff0cd021328e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11564,"name":"Chris Dent","email":"cdent@anticdent.org","username":"chdent"},"change_message_id":"cbbc3ad9ca8cc8ec0da35903b50528fb64ea0ed3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"1ff4f0b8_e36f1a22","updated":"2026-08-19 11:34:32.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t know what path of confusion and boredom led me here, but I like this: very simple but with excellent value.\n\n(Apparently I\u0027m still listed as core on placement)","commit_id":"ce8980c3e4d7af7134b9c939025ff0cd021328e2"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"e163228f062d3da6a686e22739ad533f971cf060","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"29de3b06_75adba32","updated":"2026-08-26 15:54:13.000000000","message":"note oslo.services feature feeze was a week ago so the depency wont be in 2026.2\nhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/995128","commit_id":"ce8980c3e4d7af7134b9c939025ff0cd021328e2"}]}