)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":748,"name":"Armando Migliaccio","email":"armamig@gmail.com","username":"armando-migliaccio"},"change_message_id":"deefb2c265c474b7fdaa3c7ac0c947c99c9467ff","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"neutron: kill non-dvr OVS scenario"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"The project is moving into DVR+HA direction for all gate jobs. At this"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"point, adding jobs that are not DVR+HA is counterproductive."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":""},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"Of course, since Linuxbridge does not work with DVR yet, we keep that"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"other scenario job flavour as-is. But there is no excuse to care about"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":1,"id":"da4df55a_aa251ac3","line":10,"updated":"2016-12-22 16:01:10.000000000","message":"IIRC this job was initially introduced to test QoS scenarios. However, since then any effort has lingered.\n\nKilling this job may prevent us from testing scenarios for features that are not compatible with DVR, but is this something we really want to pursue going forward? I feel that from now on, any feature (if affected by/affecting DVR) should be able to handle DVR in some fashion.","commit_id":"de695137693eec82b00cb0d733cc076b38017c9d"}]}