)]}'
{"/COMMIT_MSG":[{"author":{"_account_id":1,"name":"James E. Blair","email":"jim@acmegating.com","username":"corvus"},"change_message_id":"ccbfb6571468d9fa8b8aec83d34de23d657657e3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":7,"context_line":"Consolidate nodepool graphs"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":""},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"I think the graphs were organised like this before grafana supported"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"parameters.  All of these dashboards are the same, and have copied all"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"the same issues with them.  This makes updating anything a massive"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"pain, and leads to inconsistency across all the dashboards."},{"line_number":13,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-gerrit-commit-message","patch_set":2,"id":"5f7c97a3_bf98f768","line":10,"updated":"2018-06-21 06:05:37.000000000","message":"No, we\u0027ve been using parameters in some dashboards for some time.\n\nThey were organized like this so that we could have a linkable dashboard for each provider.  We want to make it easy to see everything related to a single provider, and we want to make that easy to share so someone working at that provider can bookmark it.  I think that\u0027s all still desirable.  I think we should add a consolodated dashboard, but I think rather than making it a copy of these other dashboards, we should instead have a node graph for each provider so that we can see how each of them is contributing at a glance.  It\u0027s really answering a different set of questions than this one.\n\nFurther, this graph does something we never wanted to do: create graphs which explicitly compare performance characteristics of different providers.","commit_id":"ea6e5a3322a267f63949333bf1521f89d3c45cef"}]}