)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":7118,"name":"Ian Wienand","email":"iwienand@redhat.com","username":"iwienand"},"change_message_id":"eb5d980b11614eba4b34f9c9abf4955c1896e827","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"97b8a95d_629c990a","updated":"2022-08-24 23:52:38.000000000","message":"\u003e It\u0027s an interesting idea, but many Gravatar implementations cause the client to separately fetch the image, which creates privacy concerns. Do you happen to know whether the Gerrit plugin pulls and caches the images to serve up to the client instead?\n\nThis does I believe just replace icons with a link to \"gravatar.com/id\u003d\u003cemail hash\u003e\" or however it works.\n\nWe did discuss this, and found some related work that wikimedia had investigated too; discussion @\n\nhttps://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23opendev/%23opendev.2022-01-26.log.html#t2022-01-26T23:07:22\n\nideas such as proxy servers, etc. were mentioned.  I think the wrap up was that is that it would be nice to do something like this to make the interface seem a bit more visually compelling, but it\u0027s probably not possible to reconcile the way it works with other more pressing concerns such as sending access data to third-parties.","commit_id":"b5ae952c1b76d03d98eaeecfb3fd514f7ddfdd5e"}]}
