)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"48a70a9d788003e6b4df149c98ac8931810eeb37","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"ee18b7ef_1f363310","updated":"2024-02-12 13:38:20.000000000","message":"OK, then I\u0027m removing my -1, but please\n* set up the groups kayobe- and kolla-unmaintained-core\n* and add openstack-unmaintained-core as member to them\nbefore we merge this patch.","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"069cd4086839b9baa9f1c1d3792ef888de275313","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"2b6d0235_2a25f8ee","updated":"2024-02-08 16:49:40.000000000","message":"i have a question inline, but in general, if this works correctly, then i\u0027m OK with it :)","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"3ed1cda1430f264d944df136609702333f7de34a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"4ef87805_2e170546","updated":"2024-02-08 15:06:13.000000000","message":"proposed by PTL, matches what was done for ironic, so lgtm","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"}],"gerrit/acls/openstack/kolla.config":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"069cd4086839b9baa9f1c1d3792ef888de275313","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":15,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Change Owner"},{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"28120143_34b913b4","line":18,"updated":"2024-02-08 16:49:40.000000000","message":"except this line and the one at the bottom with kolla-unmaintained-core, are all the other ACLs part of the original unmaintained/* section. do we need to repeat all of them here?\n\nI mean, either this should contain only the mentioned two line, or the other case is (if we need to repeat everything) then to add the openstack-unmaintained-core group here as well, am i right?","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"ced5f2c12425ff87bd00b32a4806d2e5a5193cdc","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"47029117_d2025ced","line":19,"updated":"2024-02-09 15:51:49.000000000","message":"IIUC the magic lies within this line, which says to override the global acl by only what is specified in this section\n\nif you want to leave permissions for the openstack-unmaintained-core group in addition, then you are right, but then this whole patch kind of isn\u0027t kind of needed and interested persons could just become members of the global group?","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"74ff9329098b1d03f4bc5ec9325e8fccb569a3e9","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"611ce010_091798f9","line":19,"in_reply_to":"0fe49e8d_6061ad9a","updated":"2024-02-12 10:22:42.000000000","message":"that is a really good question. as i understood, the main goal of Unmaintained was to remove the burden of maintaining old stable branches from project teams. but, it needs another (un)maintainer team (overlapping is allowed, though :)).","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":22629,"name":"Michal Nasiadka","email":"mnasiadka@gmail.com","username":"mnasiadka"},"change_message_id":"2f38beced70f99e169c515f6d1213d88939103c0","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"cce54b3f_ff91a62f","line":19,"in_reply_to":"44718c0c_17e66f5c","updated":"2024-02-12 13:17:53.000000000","message":"Fine by me then :-)","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"8324bb6e4372a31f7ce06415484ae106a56fe8f6","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"c2c0d288_8f0a5ea8","line":19,"in_reply_to":"47029117_d2025ced","updated":"2024-02-09 16:35:42.000000000","message":"ah, ACK, right. then it\u0027s OK to me. so then the only thing is that openstack-unmaintained-core group **has to be included** in kolla-unmaintained-core group. and we probably should not accept this until that group is set up correctly.","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":22629,"name":"Michal Nasiadka","email":"mnasiadka@gmail.com","username":"mnasiadka"},"change_message_id":"2f948cd5096d3ef98634b60ff5928ecca774d2fc","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"b2044609_0c676e36","line":19,"in_reply_to":"611ce010_091798f9","updated":"2024-02-12 10:36:33.000000000","message":"Basically we agreed in the Kolla community that there are some interested maintainers (mainly my employer) - who would like to maintain Yoga for N months.\nLet\u0027s start with having both openstack-unmaintained-core and kolla/kayobe-unmaintained-core and see how that works out for the future.\nI\u0027m not a Gerrit ACL expert - can anybody comment what needs to be changed here to achieve that?","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"d1ae53aca0a4c586bb53686e3e6afce7f8034796","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"c822591d_ff61e149","line":19,"in_reply_to":"70081676_9c53d143","updated":"2024-02-09 19:34:03.000000000","message":"OK, so now, based on the Ironic team\u0027s example, my above comment is relevant :)\n\n(Ironic team created their own ironic-unmaintained-core group, that overrode openstack-unmaintained-core group\u0027s rights)\n\nAnd let me rephrase a bit: instead of \"has to be included\", we should discuss on the patch whether the team really wants to exclude the general openstack-unmaintained-core group. If not, then the new project specific group should contain the openstack-unmaintained-core group. (as an analogue to the stable-maint-core vs \u003cproject\u003e-maint groups relation)\n\nSo, before we continue: may i ask if the team is OK if the openstack-unmaintained-core group keep its current right to these repos? (giving -1 to highlight this question)","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"e75cd389c03815ac2abbeef82cabc3f89debfb70","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"44718c0c_17e66f5c","line":19,"in_reply_to":"b2044609_0c676e36","updated":"2024-02-12 13:16:42.000000000","message":"ACK. No need to update this change, but the kayobe-unmaintained-core and kolla-unmaintained-core group should be setup in gerrit with openstack-unmaintained-core added as member.","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"9b2458b783a640912348f5344aabc17f79929b6e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"70081676_9c53d143","line":19,"in_reply_to":"c2c0d288_8f0a5ea8","updated":"2024-02-09 16:56:39.000000000","message":"i mean, similarly like the stable-maint-core group is part of the \u003cproject\u003e-stable-maint groups. for example: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/0c53b8f80897aa9e7cee7347e4710bd9b8bdfbd2,members","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"},{"author":{"_account_id":22629,"name":"Michal Nasiadka","email":"mnasiadka@gmail.com","username":"mnasiadka"},"change_message_id":"c94961b772d5907cbec0279910c07da85372da9c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":16,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":17,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group Release Managers"},{"line_number":18,"context_line":"\tabandon \u003d group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":19,"context_line":"\texclusiveGroupPermissions \u003d abandon label-Code-Review label-Workflow"},{"line_number":20,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group Project Bootstrappers"},{"line_number":21,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -2..+2 group kolla-unmaintained-core"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"\tlabel-Code-Review \u003d -1..+1 group Registered Users"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-ini","patch_set":3,"id":"0fe49e8d_6061ad9a","line":19,"in_reply_to":"c822591d_ff61e149","updated":"2024-02-12 08:20:16.000000000","message":"I think generally it\u0027s OK, but I would like to understand what happens if Kolla/Kayobe decides to EOL Yoga in 6 months time - would openstack-unmaintained-core oppose and still maintain the branch?\nI think we need to work out differences compared to EM in the past.","commit_id":"3b42ccb28ace628926e48a53cc075cecb3094742"}]}