)]}'
{"doc/source/stable-branches.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":8410,"name":"Richard Theis","email":"rtheis@us.ibm.com","username":"rtheis"},"change_message_id":"b81ae581c8b3a8b5759f846c99691b9b1a93de7e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"  acceptable"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"* Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security patches are acceptable"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":""},{"line_number":24,"context_line":".. note::"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"   It\u0027s nevertheless allowed to backport fixes for other bugs if their safety"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"   can be easily proved. For example, documentation fixes, debug log message"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"   typo corrections, test only changes, patches that enhance test coverage,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8a016a_551f9307","line":24,"updated":"2015-11-19 13:41:47.000000000","message":"Does this note apply to all support phases, including Phase III?","commit_id":"2fd2acb7ac99f09f8ece6541066c0e9fc140a35b"},{"author":{"_account_id":8410,"name":"Richard Theis","email":"rtheis@us.ibm.com","username":"rtheis"},"change_message_id":"c4a2ecda5bc238cd89bb87dad40d20c056d09879","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"  acceptable"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"* Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security patches are acceptable"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":""},{"line_number":24,"context_line":".. note::"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"   It\u0027s nevertheless allowed to backport fixes for other bugs if their safety"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"   can be easily proved. For example, documentation fixes, debug log message"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"   typo corrections, test only changes, patches that enhance test coverage,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8a016a_783acee8","line":24,"in_reply_to":"ba8a016a_18b4e232","updated":"2015-11-19 14:05:22.000000000","message":"The last phase has a clear definition today and was wondering if that should be maintained to avoid an open-ended \"for example\".  I would prefer that, but am curious what others think.","commit_id":"2fd2acb7ac99f09f8ece6541066c0e9fc140a35b"},{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"61f6374bb5abda36662721a0bc5acf17a41ffd41","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"  acceptable"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"* Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security patches are acceptable"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":""},{"line_number":24,"context_line":".. note::"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"   It\u0027s nevertheless allowed to backport fixes for other bugs if their safety"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"   can be easily proved. For example, documentation fixes, debug log message"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"   typo corrections, test only changes, patches that enhance test coverage,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8a016a_b5983f1d","line":24,"in_reply_to":"ba8a016a_551f9307","updated":"2015-11-19 13:45:24.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t see why it should be different for any supported branch as long as the backport is completely safe to do.","commit_id":"2fd2acb7ac99f09f8ece6541066c0e9fc140a35b"},{"author":{"_account_id":8410,"name":"Richard Theis","email":"rtheis@us.ibm.com","username":"rtheis"},"change_message_id":"41ae30d5b41f21ec0df8bb3a4218e7dfc4035b5b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"  acceptable"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"* Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security patches are acceptable"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":""},{"line_number":24,"context_line":".. note::"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"   It\u0027s nevertheless allowed to backport fixes for other bugs if their safety"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"   can be easily proved. For example, documentation fixes, debug log message"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"   typo corrections, test only changes, patches that enhance test coverage,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8a016a_55da33e9","line":24,"in_reply_to":"ba8a016a_551f9307","updated":"2015-11-19 13:46:07.000000000","message":"Sorry, I re-read the commit and see that it does apply to Phase 2+, but am wondering if maybe this is too broad of a scope for Phase 3.  Maybe Phase 3 should only accept documentation and test changes.","commit_id":"2fd2acb7ac99f09f8ece6541066c0e9fc140a35b"},{"author":{"_account_id":9656,"name":"Ihar Hrachyshka","email":"ihrachys@redhat.com","username":"ihrachys","status":"Red Hat Networking Systems Engineer"},"change_message_id":"ed82699b3bc6d2a91c3572b70ab36a8d44573f98","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":21,"context_line":"  acceptable"},{"line_number":22,"context_line":"* Phase III (more than 12 months): Only security patches are acceptable"},{"line_number":23,"context_line":""},{"line_number":24,"context_line":".. note::"},{"line_number":25,"context_line":"   It\u0027s nevertheless allowed to backport fixes for other bugs if their safety"},{"line_number":26,"context_line":"   can be easily proved. For example, documentation fixes, debug log message"},{"line_number":27,"context_line":"   typo corrections, test only changes, patches that enhance test coverage,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":1,"id":"ba8a016a_18b4e232","line":24,"in_reply_to":"ba8a016a_55da33e9","updated":"2015-11-19 13:50:31.000000000","message":"My take is as long as there is no way for a change to break stable branch, there is no rationale not to allow it in, as long as it makes some difference, even if negligible.\n\nDo you think we should be absolutely strict with it?","commit_id":"2fd2acb7ac99f09f8ece6541066c0e9fc140a35b"}]}