)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"9a6a5095a1ccda255ffeb76de81be740c0314871","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ca4f1373_7fc910cd","updated":"2022-04-04 18:36:51.000000000","message":"I\u0027m cc\u0027ing people I know have expressed interest in this. This is just a start, let me know what you think.","commit_id":"6d9bac895ef1e0b3f655616d6d80cf067452f4f6"},{"author":{"_account_id":11904,"name":"Sean McGinnis","email":"sean.mcginnis@gmail.com","username":"SeanM"},"change_message_id":"444c56255e9778bbccf6aafd08b3a82f2a4f8175","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"739c0afd_fbe7ea2a","updated":"2022-04-04 20:04:17.000000000","message":"Great to add!","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"838f0eacf4ed294fc35a1a5c712d2c67246f1d0a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"19933f40_7338cd53","updated":"2022-04-04 20:16:23.000000000","message":"Pushing up another rev with one more bullet about filing a bug if one is not found and correcting the typo Brian noted.","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"2e511063414a9760c71c674e5b5727e623ad5da7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"2416ad23_d686b991","updated":"2022-04-04 20:09:39.000000000","message":"Typo and a nit noted inline.  Content is great, and PS 1 rendered fine in HTML.","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"f454464e23865f1fa56d743dde137fc0fc91f8f2","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"ed256185_76086188","updated":"2022-04-04 23:19:42.000000000","message":"thanks, this looks good content. ","commit_id":"821860cb4d8e4650a5228070d42c2091ed249141"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"a3d2f768e54ae5cf8433ec1725148af841dc7ce4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"ffd5e4c8_c45fc996","updated":"2022-04-05 21:12:25.000000000","message":"LGTM","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"88fb8d3a21ce9ee8e625b12145a86f0fcb160781","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"613e0db7_35d2e088","updated":"2022-04-05 17:17:42.000000000","message":"thanks, lgtm","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"31b7b3f4716a180734eb124ebe4f81f2dc94c5af","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"c8c7fd07_cb89f796","updated":"2022-04-08 00:32:34.000000000","message":"this seems ready and I do not see any further comment.\n\nThanks Dan for working on this. ","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"}],"doc/source/testing.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"2e511063414a9760c71c674e5b5727e623ad5da7","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":155,"context_line":"Suggestions For Determining Causes of Failure"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"---------------------------------------------"},{"line_number":157,"context_line":""},{"line_number":158,"context_line":"This more art than science, but here are some ideas:"},{"line_number":159,"context_line":""},{"line_number":160,"context_line":"- First examine the ``job-output.txt`` file to see if the job failed"},{"line_number":161,"context_line":"  while running tests, or earlier when setup was running."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"ad9aba44_c1504fa7","line":158,"range":{"start_line":158,"start_character":0,"end_line":158,"end_character":5},"updated":"2022-04-04 20:09:39.000000000","message":"Should be \"This is\"","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"838f0eacf4ed294fc35a1a5c712d2c67246f1d0a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":155,"context_line":"Suggestions For Determining Causes of Failure"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"---------------------------------------------"},{"line_number":157,"context_line":""},{"line_number":158,"context_line":"This more art than science, but here are some ideas:"},{"line_number":159,"context_line":""},{"line_number":160,"context_line":"- First examine the ``job-output.txt`` file to see if the job failed"},{"line_number":161,"context_line":"  while running tests, or earlier when setup was running."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"f8ed0561_600b2111","line":158,"range":{"start_line":158,"start_character":0,"end_line":158,"end_character":5},"in_reply_to":"ad9aba44_c1504fa7","updated":"2022-04-04 20:16:23.000000000","message":"Yep, thanks.","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"b7efeb240c4631a1e2dd529d0dbb075fbc931dde","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":155,"context_line":"Suggestions For Determining Causes of Failure"},{"line_number":156,"context_line":"---------------------------------------------"},{"line_number":157,"context_line":""},{"line_number":158,"context_line":"This more art than science, but here are some ideas:"},{"line_number":159,"context_line":""},{"line_number":160,"context_line":"- First examine the ``job-output.txt`` file to see if the job failed"},{"line_number":161,"context_line":"  while running tests, or earlier when setup was running."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"12ab641b_5674c5a4","line":158,"range":{"start_line":158,"start_character":0,"end_line":158,"end_character":5},"in_reply_to":"f8ed0561_600b2111","updated":"2022-04-04 20:31:26.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"2e511063414a9760c71c674e5b5727e623ad5da7","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":168,"context_line":"  attach a volume, it would be good to look at ``n-api``,"},{"line_number":169,"context_line":"  ``n-cpu``, ``c-api``, and ``c-vol`` logs as Nova and Cinder are"},{"line_number":170,"context_line":"  both involved in that process."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"- Test failures on integrated (i.e. devstack) jobs generally print out"},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"  resource IDs, such as instance or volume UUIDs. Use these to search"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"  the relevant logs for errors and warnings related to a resource that"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":"  was involved in the test failure."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"8888cd28_8f8e7e28","line":171,"range":{"start_line":171,"start_character":31,"end_line":171,"end_character":35},"updated":"2022-04-04 20:09:39.000000000","message":"nit: OpenStack house style used to prefer \"that is, \" instead of the Latin abbreviation.","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"ca3b83b2bf3f5c2f99b666292b8d06d4571a9155","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":168,"context_line":"  attach a volume, it would be good to look at ``n-api``,"},{"line_number":169,"context_line":"  ``n-cpu``, ``c-api``, and ``c-vol`` logs as Nova and Cinder are"},{"line_number":170,"context_line":"  both involved in that process."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"- Test failures on integrated (i.e. devstack) jobs generally print out"},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"  resource IDs, such as instance or volume UUIDs. Use these to search"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"  the relevant logs for errors and warnings related to a resource that"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":"  was involved in the test failure."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"6ff1eec1_7f8c8e90","line":171,"range":{"start_line":171,"start_character":31,"end_line":171,"end_character":35},"in_reply_to":"0d4e9f5b_6240bf3e","updated":"2022-04-05 03:53:15.000000000","message":"Can\u0027t find the reference.  There used to be an explicit statement somewhere back in the Anne Gentle days.  I think your suggestion to rewrite the sentence to be tempest focused is a definite improvement.","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"6ba9d42487502ccd735068168c740400e131cb42","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":168,"context_line":"  attach a volume, it would be good to look at ``n-api``,"},{"line_number":169,"context_line":"  ``n-cpu``, ``c-api``, and ``c-vol`` logs as Nova and Cinder are"},{"line_number":170,"context_line":"  both involved in that process."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"- Test failures on integrated (i.e. devstack) jobs generally print out"},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"  resource IDs, such as instance or volume UUIDs. Use these to search"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"  the relevant logs for errors and warnings related to a resource that"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":"  was involved in the test failure."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"452ad29c_a4af9121","line":171,"range":{"start_line":171,"start_character":31,"end_line":171,"end_character":35},"in_reply_to":"6ff1eec1_7f8c8e90","updated":"2022-04-05 17:36:51.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"838f0eacf4ed294fc35a1a5c712d2c67246f1d0a","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":168,"context_line":"  attach a volume, it would be good to look at ``n-api``,"},{"line_number":169,"context_line":"  ``n-cpu``, ``c-api``, and ``c-vol`` logs as Nova and Cinder are"},{"line_number":170,"context_line":"  both involved in that process."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"- Test failures on integrated (i.e. devstack) jobs generally print out"},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"  resource IDs, such as instance or volume UUIDs. Use these to search"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"  the relevant logs for errors and warnings related to a resource that"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":"  was involved in the test failure."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"0d4e9f5b_6240bf3e","line":171,"range":{"start_line":171,"start_character":31,"end_line":171,"end_character":35},"in_reply_to":"8888cd28_8f8e7e28","updated":"2022-04-04 20:16:23.000000000","message":"Got a reference for that? It\u0027s the first I\u0027m hearing of it. \"that is devstack\" doesn\u0027t read as well to me. Can you think of some other way to say it here? Like \"usually devstack\". Perhaps it would be better to rewrite this as tempest-focused:\n\n Test failures in tempest-based jobs generally...","commit_id":"3f09f363447be7cdaeed7d983bf28ebf5ba32707"},{"author":{"_account_id":5263,"name":"Jeremy Stanley","display_name":"fungi","email":"fungi@yuggoth.org","username":"fungi","status":"missing, presumed fed"},"change_message_id":"725c2bb764406f9dbed512fe5415bf085dccd6f9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":124,"context_line":"   of the proposed patch itself, but with an eye to the problem being"},{"line_number":125,"context_line":"   unrelated. Try to determine the most obvious cause for the failure."},{"line_number":126,"context_line":"#. If the failure is likely caused by the proposed patch, revise the"},{"line_number":127,"context_line":"   change and re-submit."},{"line_number":128,"context_line":"#. If the failure appears to be totally unrelated to the patch at"},{"line_number":129,"context_line":"   hand, look for some indication of what went wrong. Only after you"},{"line_number":130,"context_line":"   have done this should you ask Zuul to re-run the tests. To do this,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"4f8e32a5_2775d109","line":127,"updated":"2022-04-04 20:22:58.000000000","message":"Perhaps suggest trying to reproduce locally if convenient when revising, too? That increases confidence the next test run won\u0027t be wasted on the same problem. Also if your patch gets multiple failed jobs, don\u0027t simply assume all are caused by a single problem. It would be unfortunate to notice a pedantic whitespace issue raised by a linter, fix and push that only to see that there are other jobs failing on deeper issues in your code which you could have spotted sooner if only you had looked past the first failed job.","commit_id":"b11b031613c83db689d52e4971c8c568fa3da7af"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"b7efeb240c4631a1e2dd529d0dbb075fbc931dde","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":124,"context_line":"   of the proposed patch itself, but with an eye to the problem being"},{"line_number":125,"context_line":"   unrelated. Try to determine the most obvious cause for the failure."},{"line_number":126,"context_line":"#. If the failure is likely caused by the proposed patch, revise the"},{"line_number":127,"context_line":"   change and re-submit."},{"line_number":128,"context_line":"#. If the failure appears to be totally unrelated to the patch at"},{"line_number":129,"context_line":"   hand, look for some indication of what went wrong. Only after you"},{"line_number":130,"context_line":"   have done this should you ask Zuul to re-run the tests. To do this,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":3,"id":"57c3b7cb_d72da953","line":127,"in_reply_to":"4f8e32a5_2775d109","updated":"2022-04-04 20:31:26.000000000","message":"Yeah it\u0027s hard to get too far into things that should be obvious without the language devolving into insults, but...fair point :)","commit_id":"b11b031613c83db689d52e4971c8c568fa3da7af"},{"author":{"_account_id":11975,"name":"Slawek Kaplonski","email":"skaplons@redhat.com","username":"slaweq"},"change_message_id":"6c8a86eb3177c55cc2f5ffb5374ef7d82e4de984","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"},{"line_number":150,"context_line":"   failed, rechecking to get another data point.\""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"4fc9ca88_f01e6da5","line":147,"updated":"2022-04-05 08:50:39.000000000","message":"maybe You can also mention here that if user don\u0027t know reported bug with same issue, he/she can always ask in the project\u0027s irc channel if that\u0027s somehow knows issue.","commit_id":"821860cb4d8e4650a5228070d42c2091ed249141"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"6ba9d42487502ccd735068168c740400e131cb42","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"},{"line_number":150,"context_line":"   failed, rechecking to get another data point.\""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"22e2a9cf_382616c5","line":147,"in_reply_to":"46dfdd22_05f1daa3","updated":"2022-04-05 17:36:51.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"821860cb4d8e4650a5228070d42c2091ed249141"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"6b93fca241519312285849d014cd61f9516810cf","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"},{"line_number":150,"context_line":"   failed, rechecking to get another data point.\""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"b7842055_efb32553","line":147,"in_reply_to":"4fc9ca88_f01e6da5","updated":"2022-04-05 13:03:51.000000000","message":"+1, good idea. and even there is no known bug, ping on IRC can be a good notification to team about failure.","commit_id":"821860cb4d8e4650a5228070d42c2091ed249141"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"993a0ea0dfdfef1b05f1e7171d24b305e9f015ab","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"},{"line_number":150,"context_line":"   failed, rechecking to get another data point.\""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"46dfdd22_05f1daa3","line":147,"in_reply_to":"b7842055_efb32553","updated":"2022-04-05 13:36:02.000000000","message":"I tried to say that on L152. I could say IRC specifically if you think it\u0027s important, but there are other methods that may be better, like the mailing list. This is already pretty verbose, so I didn\u0027t want to try to list/explain how to do that as well.","commit_id":"821860cb4d8e4650a5228070d42c2091ed249141"},{"author":{"_account_id":4146,"name":"Clark Boylan","email":"cboylan@sapwetik.org","username":"cboylan"},"change_message_id":"6a1c24b3d4fe0021f1c45031d373d95850ee5b87","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":143,"context_line":"#. The gold standard for recheck commands is ``recheck bug #XXXXXXX``,"},{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":5,"id":"187a234d_eda28592","line":146,"updated":"2022-04-05 18:26:21.000000000","message":"Note I\u0027m not aware of any current tracking based on this. But having the comments in a consistent format would enable API queries to do this.","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"},{"author":{"_account_id":5263,"name":"Jeremy Stanley","display_name":"fungi","email":"fungi@yuggoth.org","username":"fungi","status":"missing, presumed fed"},"change_message_id":"7341e6a3d20a58f1f1d6423cb912fbb1c7f15d82","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":143,"context_line":"#. The gold standard for recheck commands is ``recheck bug #XXXXXXX``,"},{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":5,"id":"1d8594ca_bf03e150","line":146,"updated":"2022-04-05 19:51:06.000000000","message":"Sort of. The precursor to elastic-recheck was a recheck tracker which correlated bug numbers, but we quickly discovered that it was a pointless exercise (from an analysis perspective) because of bad actors poisoning the data with random bug numbers. The current iteration of elastic-recheck associates known failure patterns in job logs with bug reports or other identifiers, in an attempt to provide a more accurate alternative.","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"7c8b47b1761ab3e5b2162b555812699f73e1429e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":143,"context_line":"#. The gold standard for recheck commands is ``recheck bug #XXXXXXX``,"},{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":5,"id":"80f95ad5_1e73946c","line":146,"in_reply_to":"187a234d_eda28592","updated":"2022-04-05 19:21:47.000000000","message":"I thought we used that format for elastic recheck accounting back in the day. However, what I meant by tracking here is bugs we\u0027ve got marked as \"gate blocker\" which are tracked by the project team and not necessarily any sort of actual mechanical \"a recheck against this bug adds points automatically\" or any sort of thing.","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"},{"author":{"_account_id":4393,"name":"Dan Smith","email":"dms@danplanet.com","username":"danms"},"change_message_id":"82b4fe49d5966aa3b7aebaf976752f3133e4fb92","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":143,"context_line":"#. The gold standard for recheck commands is ``recheck bug #XXXXXXX``,"},{"line_number":144,"context_line":"   which directly references a known problem that is being"},{"line_number":145,"context_line":"   worked. Doing this helps add heat to that bug and enables stats"},{"line_number":146,"context_line":"   tracking so the community knows what bugs are blocking the most"},{"line_number":147,"context_line":"   people in the CI system."},{"line_number":148,"context_line":"#. In some cases, it may be entirely unclear why something failed. In"},{"line_number":149,"context_line":"   this case, you may need to recheck with a reason of \"Not sure what"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":5,"id":"aafb20ff_8b1261df","line":146,"in_reply_to":"1d8594ca_bf03e150","updated":"2022-04-05 19:54:42.000000000","message":"Right, that\u0027s what I meant. I know it was a failure to induce widespread proper behavior and that\u0027s why we\u0027re not trying to encourage everyone to do that here. The point of recommending it here is just keeping with that goal of also getting people to file or find bugs that refer to gate failures, but not imply that there\u0027s any actual mechanical linkage. I think what we\u0027ve got here is fine as it is, even though it evokes baggage for us old baggage-laden people :)","commit_id":"ef313d1f8eb4bccbf91e8621a417651602444972"}]}