)]}'
{"manifests/policy.pp":[{"author":{"_account_id":21129,"name":"Alan Bishop","email":"abishopsweng@gmail.com","username":"ASBishop","status":"ex Red Hat"},"change_message_id":"305faa50c74a5ebc61e6b67a0a1d2acf915daac1","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":9,"context_line":"#  Defaults to $::os_service_default."},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"#"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"# [*enforce_new_defaults*]"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"#  (Optional) Whether or not to use old deprecated defaults when evaluating"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"#  policies."},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"#  Defaults to $::os_service_default."},{"line_number":15,"context_line":"#"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-puppet","patch_set":1,"id":"733784f2_9be02a4e","line":12,"updated":"2021-03-24 12:58:04.000000000","message":"nit: The comment seems to describe the opposite condition from the one hinted at by the parameter name. That is, the parameter name refers to \"new defaults\" but the comment talks about using the \"old deprecated defaults\" (the reverse).\n\nI know the comment is taken from the puppet-oslo patch that merged, but I still want to record my observation.","commit_id":"3de84ef2eea1d657e1fe67854582cfc774d0ef9c"}]}