)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"0cc1ead46636a9ffd2f84e9649f32e8426337433","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"0d4ec096_ac337abc","updated":"2022-08-10 02:48:43.000000000","message":"```\n4) ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets is expected to run ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets([{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e\"ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\"}]) and return [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e64}]\n   Failure/Error: it { should run.with_params([{\u0027netmask\u0027 \u003d\u003e \u0027ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\u0027}]).and_return([{\u0027netmask\u0027 \u003d\u003e 64}])}\n     expected ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets([{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e\"ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\"}]) to have returned [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e64}] instead of [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e128}]\n   # ./spec/functions/ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets_spec.rb:6:in `block (2 levels) in \u003ctop (required)\u003e\u0027\n\n5) ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets is expected to run ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets([{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e\"ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\", \"gateway\"\u003d\u003e\"fd00::1\"}]) and return [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e64}]\n   Failure/Error: it { should run.with_params([{\u0027netmask\u0027 \u003d\u003e \u0027ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\u0027, \u0027gateway\u0027 \u003d\u003e \u0027fd00::1\u0027}]).and_return([{\u0027netmask\u0027 \u003d\u003e 64}])}\n     expected ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets([{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e\"ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff::\", \"gateway\"\u003d\u003e\"fd00::1\"}]) to have returned [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e64}] instead of [{\"netmask\"\u003d\u003e128}]\n   # ./spec/functions/ipv6_normalize_dnsmasq_ip_subnets_spec.rb:11:in `block (2 levels) in \u003ctop (required)\u003e\u0027\n```\n\nIt seems IPAddr.new().prefix does not behave in the same manner and can\u0027t replace the current implementation.","commit_id":"e566c769e5283405261c9f3b2df0d67946f072cb"}]}