)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"1c49b3a7655db484bc7c70170bd70d88f9a163df","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"f5e673a6_f5affa4f","updated":"2022-02-28 13:14:31.000000000","message":"I prefer keeping these CentOS9 jobs experimental or at least non-voting, considering the fact that Puppet OpenStack project does not plan to officially support CentOS 9 in Wallaby atm. This follows the current decision in RDO which provides only \"unofficial\" builds.","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"b30c7f738ddf8fa42845dae8ec931314898e7299","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"5d203fc1_54c90455","updated":"2022-03-01 09:33:08.000000000","message":"k updating thanks","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"d4607204666faa34426a8b069afe28dc972ebd60","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"de7a2eee_4d694e02","in_reply_to":"1013b0ce_bf1b77b3","updated":"2022-03-01 09:37:20.000000000","message":"Do we have anything to point to (discussion/bug/mailing list etc) with respect to \"Puppet OpenStack project does not plan to officially support CentOS 9 in Wallaby\"","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"37a3ee9536838ef36835e7dbef43b45e3827ad1b","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"82e852f1_2bfaef5a","in_reply_to":"1decadd0_e4576858","updated":"2022-03-01 16:23:11.000000000","message":"@takashi please see the topic branch for the rest ;) thanks","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"b30c7f738ddf8fa42845dae8ec931314898e7299","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1013b0ce_bf1b77b3","in_reply_to":"649c0bd9_e69a690a","updated":"2022-03-01 09:33:08.000000000","message":"OK.. then i will make then non-voting here? And I guess the same will apply to all the puppet-* repos?","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"670a922a81cf088454652270a42bc16bae420974","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"fc75e4ba_a482f547","in_reply_to":"9395d60f_0655287e","updated":"2022-03-01 10:55:02.000000000","message":"I think the reasonable point is to add these jobs as non-voting only to check queue. As adding non-voting jobs to gate doesn\u0027t have much effect while it consumes some resource.\n\nWe do not usually trigger experimental tests thus it is not a good option IMO.\n\nAdding the job to periodic queue might be an option but currently we don\u0027t use periodic queue and honestly speaking we don\u0027t pay much attention to it, so I prefer avoiding this at the first stage.","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"729b4f7f990028889fb4a17e37157fc1c883ad45","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"9395d60f_0655287e","in_reply_to":"af3c8da2_6d54fb9a","updated":"2022-03-01 10:29:34.000000000","message":"OK thanks.\n\nSo ... how do we proceed. Is the latest version acceptable?\n\nI am not sure it makes sense to be running these jobs as non voting in check and gate\n\nPerhaps it makes more sense to add an experimental queue and place them there?\n\nI have posted only puppet-oslo that depends-on this there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-oslo/+/831352\n\nI will hold on posting anything else (the rest of the puppet-* repos) until we agree on the approach.","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"77ed890300f175e3793edf0d41fdfcc76732734e","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"af3c8da2_6d54fb9a","in_reply_to":"de7a2eee_4d694e02","updated":"2022-03-01 09:58:50.000000000","message":"There is not documented agreement about this atm and we can initiate some discussion, maybe.\n\nBecause our main target in upstream is RDO, our support policy basically should follow the one in RDO.\n\nIf we aim to make c9 tripleo job voting in Wallaby then we should officially support CentOS 9. This requires adding proper test coverage (unit tests and integration tests) for CentOS 9. Note because puppet openstack has stable/xean release, adding new support for stable/wallaby requires the same for stable/xena first. Considering the effort and the resources we need to add these support I currently hesitate to go for extending support coverage in these past branches.\n\nEven if we do not support CentOS 9 officially, we can fix any issue with CentOS 9 in stable/wallaby and xena as long as the fix doesn\u0027t break CentOS 8.","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"6b09122128095bb6d2ce3fe5fdbdaeee9fc50561","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"649c0bd9_e69a690a","in_reply_to":"f5e673a6_f5affa4f","updated":"2022-02-28 13:15:11.000000000","message":"(posting this to reopen my comment)","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"d779f4e9377ed29a7a4b426fd70f7408e26e22b4","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1decadd0_e4576858","in_reply_to":"fc75e4ba_a482f547","updated":"2022-03-01 14:46:24.000000000","message":"ack let\u0027s do that... and it means I\u0027ll do the same there too https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-oslo/+/831352/1/.zuul.yaml and the rest of the puppet","commit_id":"30a2d8c5031ede64a57bb8fe455d7c0dfee9785e"},{"author":{"_account_id":8449,"name":"Marios Andreou","email":"marios.andreou@gmail.com","username":"marios"},"change_message_id":"fafb1615150a8b4c6cdf57b401009e4c4301b735","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"cea5b009_3c1eadd0","updated":"2022-03-03 09:42:00.000000000","message":"k self.merging \n\nstared some more don\u0027t think we missed something\n\nneed this for the rest in the series.","commit_id":"420cf20f980658f413756437d8e3d3ca3cf6565f"}]}