)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":16137,"name":"Tobias Urdin","email":"tobias.urdin@binero.com","username":"tobasco"},"change_message_id":"a6abff721079c8c1e5a4e3441ae24ce45b963e57","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"69970e42_7a915da8","updated":"2024-10-08 09:59:15.000000000","message":"do you want us to migrate to block-storage everywhere soon-ish or just roll with volumev3 for the forseeable future?","commit_id":"e6345da838c1168b6e7018ade67c7108c05c1472"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"018072a7997c17af0745623e085f503b2dfe1d2a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"0f59b9d6_a1a82212","in_reply_to":"69970e42_7a915da8","updated":"2024-10-08 10:01:16.000000000","message":"I think the right path is to add block-storage service type with the legacy volume v3 service type kept, until all of the problems caused by removal of volumev3 service type is caught.","commit_id":"e6345da838c1168b6e7018ade67c7108c05c1472"}]}