)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"ad9127a4fde3c041ba95e32f4c1433987f6ca908","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"628da7c6_ea92a588","updated":"2026-09-10 06:25:25.000000000","message":"I\u0027m wondering if we should eventually get rid of our ruby implementation and squash it into this, after we make the current implementation to adopt to 6.4.0+.","commit_id":"044a9da51ef49cf258e07280795486b47c195269"},{"author":{"_account_id":8064,"name":"Jake Yip","email":"jake.yip@ardc.edu.au","username":"jake"},"change_message_id":"db9124632173bab71776d14f313e4102d912a64d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b6cfa1a3_0548d385","in_reply_to":"628da7c6_ea92a588","updated":"2026-09-12 15:13:12.000000000","message":"sounds like a good idea. probably a two cycle thing? one cycle to bump min require to 6.4.0, one cycle to switch.","commit_id":"044a9da51ef49cf258e07280795486b47c195269"}]}