)]}'
{"releasenotes/notes/client-timeout-c110deab64aa1944.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"55ed83dc9857052b10cd06376e984d940a9117a6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":2,"context_line":"features:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    A new parameter client_timeout has been added to the storage::server class"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    (useful only if type\u003dobject). It is similar to the client_timeout parameter"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    used in the proxy class, except that it is for object. Note that it is"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"    strongly advised that the object-server is configured with a timeout value"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    higher than the one in the proxy-server, and the proxy-server should also"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"    have a value higher than its eventual haproxy in front. In other words:"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"    haproxy_timeout \u003c proxy-server_timeout \u003c object-server_timeout."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"    Previously it was only possible to set the client_timeout for the proxy."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":3,"id":"ff570b3c_722a00db","line":8,"range":{"start_line":5,"start_character":58,"end_line":8,"end_character":77},"updated":"2020-05-19 14:18:46.000000000","message":"Do you have any document by swift community about this recommendation ?\n\nFor me, it sounds more reasonable to have shorter timeout in backend to avoid the request got stack from client view.","commit_id":"9563ebcdea773ebb495da3e785b914430344d7ce"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"19741584318b4968171d46654eebe5829dc38067","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":2,"context_line":"features:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    A new parameter client_timeout has been added to the storage::server class"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    (useful only if type\u003dobject). It is similar to the client_timeout parameter"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    used in the proxy class, except that it is for object. Note that it is"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"    strongly advised that the object-server is configured with a timeout value"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    higher than the one in the proxy-server, and the proxy-server should also"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"    have a value higher than its eventual haproxy in front. In other words:"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"    haproxy_timeout \u003c proxy-server_timeout \u003c object-server_timeout."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"    Previously it was only possible to set the client_timeout for the proxy."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":3,"id":"ff570b3c_f5a39ab0","line":8,"range":{"start_line":5,"start_character":58,"end_line":8,"end_character":77},"in_reply_to":"ff570b3c_55da4677","updated":"2020-05-19 14:40:12.000000000","message":"I noticed that client timeout is used for upload traffic, then the said recommendation makes sense.\n\nHowever IMO it\u0027s better to follow swift\u0027s recommendation instead of adding new recommendation in puppet-swift.\nI think that this recommendation is still useful, and can be proposed to swift.","commit_id":"9563ebcdea773ebb495da3e785b914430344d7ce"},{"author":{"_account_id":6476,"name":"Thomas Goirand","email":"thomas@goirand.fr","username":"thomas-goirand"},"change_message_id":"4204bac916ba8fe02f9351de0d133d148ff35214","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":2,"context_line":"features:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    A new parameter client_timeout has been added to the storage::server class"},{"line_number":5,"context_line":"    (useful only if type\u003dobject). It is similar to the client_timeout parameter"},{"line_number":6,"context_line":"    used in the proxy class, except that it is for object. Note that it is"},{"line_number":7,"context_line":"    strongly advised that the object-server is configured with a timeout value"},{"line_number":8,"context_line":"    higher than the one in the proxy-server, and the proxy-server should also"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"    have a value higher than its eventual haproxy in front. In other words:"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"    haproxy_timeout \u003c proxy-server_timeout \u003c object-server_timeout."},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"    Previously it was only possible to set the client_timeout for the proxy."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":3,"id":"ff570b3c_55da4677","line":8,"range":{"start_line":5,"start_character":58,"end_line":8,"end_character":77},"in_reply_to":"ff570b3c_722a00db","updated":"2020-05-19 14:32:45.000000000","message":"This was seen from production issues, but if you prefer, I\u0027ll keep my recommends for myself! :)","commit_id":"9563ebcdea773ebb495da3e785b914430344d7ce"}]}