)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":34975,"name":"Jaromír Wysoglad","email":"jwysogla@redhat.com","username":"jwysogla"},"change_message_id":"aeb74c35fecd1654c60dd711e4275dc196d44966","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":12,"id":"734e77d6_dfe6b8aa","updated":"2024-01-05 15:41:38.000000000","message":"I\u0027d need to do something like this to get functional tests for prometheus type alarms working, so I went ahead and moved the current functional alarms to dsvm as well. What do you think about this approach @jokke?","commit_id":"1d5b06ca3970762ae9718c51cb40e3e6314dd88c"},{"author":{"_account_id":5202,"name":"Erno Kuvaja","email":"jokke@usr.fi","username":"jokke"},"change_message_id":"670a73feb1acf36703a2df4899eec977c503a2fc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":12,"id":"79ced38d_db399850","updated":"2024-01-30 15:06:52.000000000","message":"Thanks a lot Jaromir, this looks great.\n\nPerhaps the next step would be separating the gnocchi dependent tests on their own so we could specify in the job config gnocchi/prometheus execution.","commit_id":"1d5b06ca3970762ae9718c51cb40e3e6314dd88c"}]}