)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":14250,"name":"Grzegorz Grasza","email":"xek@redhat.com","username":"xek"},"change_message_id":"6b672ddd41efb7ca4321c6ca2c06a5d05369a474","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":21,"id":"0ee9b1bc_4ea60716","updated":"2023-01-04 20:30:46.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"feec004841510ebf490a35c29b592d692306f1d9"},{"author":{"_account_id":14250,"name":"Grzegorz Grasza","email":"xek@redhat.com","username":"xek"},"change_message_id":"53cd178c1bddbc0bbc333edec99a9105f2235541","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":21,"id":"3f16b214_7ece49fd","updated":"2023-01-04 14:41:38.000000000","message":"recheck","commit_id":"feec004841510ebf490a35c29b592d692306f1d9"}],"barbicanclient/v1/secrets.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7973,"name":"Douglas Mendizábal","email":"dmendiza@redhat.com","username":"dougmendizabal"},"change_message_id":"9857468024a21a2a85f44f2b5bd02cb40815dd13","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":78,"context_line":"                \"Secret type\","},{"line_number":79,"context_line":"                \"Mode\","},{"line_number":80,"context_line":"                \"Expiration\","},{"line_number":81,"context_line":"                \"Consumers\")"},{"line_number":82,"context_line":""},{"line_number":83,"context_line":"    @api_versions.wraps(\"1.0\", \"1.0\")"},{"line_number":84,"context_line":"    def _get_formatted_data(self):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":15,"id":"a9ad31c4_33f5fa17","line":81,"range":{"start_line":81,"start_character":16,"end_line":81,"end_character":27},"updated":"2022-11-09 15:56:12.000000000","message":"I don\u0027t think we should show the consumers here. Since this representation is used everywhere in the CLI, then outputting the entire list of consumer dicts here would make the output of `openstack secret list` unreadable.  It would be better to add a new subcommand instead: `openstack secret consumer list $SECRET_ID` that can list all consumers only for that specific secret.\n\nIf we do want to have different columns here, then we should revisit the idea of making these strings match the API names exactly.  e.g. \"secret_ref\" instead of \"Secret href\".  It would make it easier on users to have uniform naming for both the CLI and the Python API.  It would also be better for scripting since you wouldn\u0027t be required to quote the columns that have spaces to address them. i.e.\n\n    `SECRET_PAYLOAD\u003d$(openstack secret get --payload $SECRET_ID -c secret_ref -f value)`\n\ninstead of\n\n    `SECRET_PAYLOAD\u003d$(openstack secret get --payload $SECRET_ID -c \"Secret href\" -f value)`","commit_id":"73238322407c80f37983a9dd706ba13a2c441ade"},{"author":{"_account_id":7973,"name":"Douglas Mendizábal","email":"dmendiza@redhat.com","username":"dougmendizabal"},"change_message_id":"5260eda3f3b029b8883849d38d7ba9c98864d684","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":254,"context_line":""},{"line_number":255,"context_line":"    @consumers.setter"},{"line_number":256,"context_line":"    def consumers(self, value):"},{"line_number":257,"context_line":"        self._name \u003d value"},{"line_number":258,"context_line":""},{"line_number":259,"context_line":"    @name.setter"},{"line_number":260,"context_line":"    @immutable_after_save"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":15,"id":"d17d53f0_e301e1d8","line":257,"range":{"start_line":257,"start_character":13,"end_line":257,"end_character":18},"updated":"2022-11-09 17:40:07.000000000","message":"s/_name/_consumers/","commit_id":"73238322407c80f37983a9dd706ba13a2c441ade"}]}