)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9236,"name":"Jon Bernard","email":"jobernar@redhat.com","username":"jbernard"},"change_message_id":"cc85a660ba40b8a99d19aa015e6e2b7a6b9d58bb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"5a1d5000_be54bc63","updated":"2025-08-26 14:32:48.000000000","message":"I believe the commit should be updated to depend on this one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/926298\n\nIt\u0027s the current implementation.  I\u0027m still unsure if this patch remains compatible/valid, Markus can you weigh in?","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"},{"author":{"_account_id":27665,"name":"Markus Hentsch","email":"markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com","username":"mhen"},"change_message_id":"2d50e025d02ba2a302e86bc785d1d22d817e8bad","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"d1d74b34_129c3069","updated":"2023-12-05 14:33:28.000000000","message":"Note that this is a placeholder adjustment until a more refined way of handling this has been agreed on (e.g. new microversion in Cinder).","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"f5a20d8af23c059ae7d44d75108637e9ef5fc86f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"806df6d2_65a63eed","updated":"2025-02-27 16:05:20.000000000","message":"The patch this depends-on has been abandoned.","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"},{"author":{"_account_id":27665,"name":"Markus Hentsch","email":"markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com","username":"mhen"},"change_message_id":"9d5a9eb9a86cfc60a137b9bda73164c95677da27","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"edfa76b1_1dbad972","in_reply_to":"5a1d5000_be54bc63","updated":"2025-08-26 15:02:31.000000000","message":"Dear Jon, thank you for noticing this!\n\nI missed this one because after the LUKS rework I only actively monitor topic:\"LUKS-image-encryption\" now and this is tagged with the old topic:\"LUKS-image-encryption\".\n\nAt first I thought we missed it and need to indeed update this one but shortly after I realized that this patchset is actually unrelated to our LUKS-based rework of the image encryption because we introduce no dedicated image *encryption* in Cinder anymore due to the fact that we simply rely on its default behavior of copying the already LUKS-encrypted block data now, which blends nicely into the workflows of the new LUKS-based image format.\n\nAs such, this patchset is obsolete now and I will abandon it.","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"},{"author":{"_account_id":9236,"name":"Jon Bernard","email":"jobernar@redhat.com","username":"jbernard"},"change_message_id":"f6cddc5316bb8a4bd960c489967b41963e432c0c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"35aebc26_7cdab82b","in_reply_to":"ed12e154_7cf7aeb4","updated":"2025-08-26 15:08:07.000000000","message":"Thanks for the update!","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"},{"author":{"_account_id":27665,"name":"Markus Hentsch","email":"markus.hentsch@cloudandheat.com","username":"mhen"},"change_message_id":"68abb6d1d38158d5d9d7f8cb9d3e99643af003be","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"ed12e154_7cf7aeb4","in_reply_to":"edfa76b1_1dbad972","updated":"2025-08-26 15:05:23.000000000","message":"Sorry, I meant to write this is tagged with the old topic:\"image-encryption\" (sans the \"LUKS-\" prefix).","commit_id":"e712b08b0e25ed7405c195a9530bfd71500d3aee"}]}