)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":36770,"name":"cid","display_name":"cid","email":"cid@gr-oss.io","username":"cidelight","status":"@gr-oss upstream: Doing good IRONIC things..."},"change_message_id":"33c3ac4b832c937009d3aa5f5738d32f6b85065b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"45ee24d1_c798a7b6","updated":"2024-10-30 14:52:13.000000000","message":"Might we need a unit test validating this change (?).","commit_id":"204b25044a93dba5227c1ce2e80bccd3342ef52b"},{"author":{"_account_id":24828,"name":"Kaifeng Wang","email":"kaifeng.w@gmail.com","username":"wangkf"},"change_message_id":"cb269029e5c977fafec6f79c84a42529c7f78530","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"994fbed3_149b557c","updated":"2024-11-01 13:48:29.000000000","message":"Looks like removing port_name is fine, no need to emphasize it\u0027s a port name as it\u0027s attached to the specific resource.","commit_id":"05d847d738b8195545f1224d424143fcc51b026a"},{"author":{"_account_id":5890,"name":"Doug Goldstein","email":"cardoe@cardoe.com","username":"cardoe"},"change_message_id":"490205a9d5054da192be8f14f79b6dae548d6f7f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"5dba6429_694d7ee7","in_reply_to":"994fbed3_149b557c","updated":"2024-11-02 17:02:07.000000000","message":"this is making the client use the field that the API returns. the API uses “name” instead of “port_name” so we gotta use that.","commit_id":"05d847d738b8195545f1224d424143fcc51b026a"}]}