)]}'
{"openstackclient/tests/unit/common/test_quota.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":14937,"name":"Tang Chen","email":"imtangchen@163.com","username":"tangchen"},"change_message_id":"4e4108675e1805377f31e24376f2cf189238ad63","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":349,"context_line":""},{"line_number":350,"context_line":"        parsed_args \u003d self.check_parser(self.cmd, arglist, verifylist)"},{"line_number":351,"context_line":""},{"line_number":352,"context_line":"        self.cmd.take_action(parsed_args)"},{"line_number":353,"context_line":""},{"line_number":354,"context_line":"        self.quotas_mock.defaults.assert_called_once_with("},{"line_number":355,"context_line":"            identity_fakes.project_id)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"9a89bdaa_bcb7fcf3","line":352,"range":{"start_line":352,"start_character":17,"end_line":352,"end_character":28},"updated":"2016-09-12 08:32:45.000000000","message":"We\u0027d better also check the return value of take_action().","commit_id":"5a9dda94eb991a543755edc169f164aed5abecca"},{"author":{"_account_id":8276,"name":"kiwik","email":"chenrui.momo@gmail.com","username":"kiwik"},"change_message_id":"976863ad4da1d6793c527a93ac48c08766a0fecc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":349,"context_line":""},{"line_number":350,"context_line":"        parsed_args \u003d self.check_parser(self.cmd, arglist, verifylist)"},{"line_number":351,"context_line":""},{"line_number":352,"context_line":"        self.cmd.take_action(parsed_args)"},{"line_number":353,"context_line":""},{"line_number":354,"context_line":"        self.quotas_mock.defaults.assert_called_once_with("},{"line_number":355,"context_line":"            identity_fakes.project_id)"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":3,"id":"9a89bdaa_cb0f9486","line":352,"range":{"start_line":352,"start_character":17,"end_line":352,"end_character":28},"in_reply_to":"9a89bdaa_bcb7fcf3","updated":"2016-09-12 09:55:41.000000000","message":"The result isn\u0027t checked in orginal unit tests, but I think it make sense to add result checking, I want to do it in a separate patch, becasue that would avoid to add a lot of code that is non-related with the bug and keep the patch easy to review.","commit_id":"5a9dda94eb991a543755edc169f164aed5abecca"}]}