)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":27900,"name":"Artem Goncharov","email":"artem.goncharov@gmail.com","username":"gtema"},"change_message_id":"4a95696be1b84c3c7e926b9eb8a6a6433c80ac89","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"77192a0c_5a8a811c","updated":"2023-09-19 07:09:38.000000000","message":"I think next time stable branch spins from master we will forget to drop tips. However with the jobs branch specification on master it should be fine as well","commit_id":"41381c80b5f3583639a9cd9bab6d208684112fd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"49bb49c95b132a03fb9342505b199361a2e12e27","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"17abc382_f24be17e","updated":"2023-09-19 08:44:34.000000000","message":"Just so we\u0027re clear, the only one that\u0027s really necessary here is the removal of `osc-tox-unit-tests` since that doesn\u0027t have a branch regex, right?","commit_id":"41381c80b5f3583639a9cd9bab6d208684112fd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"3af05e4ad79ffa45d5b470d153196088fe212ecd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"f14517ea_2450ea4b","in_reply_to":"17abc382_f24be17e","updated":"2023-09-20 05:14:54.000000000","message":"None of this is strictly necessary, it is just cleanup of unused code.\n\nThe `osc-tox-unit-tests` job isn\u0027t used anywhere, there is a template of the same name, but it doesn\u0027t include that job, either.","commit_id":"41381c80b5f3583639a9cd9bab6d208684112fd7"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"802d874e77d76cfe9b736300530da1281b6a1817","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ad51659a_5e57a9be","in_reply_to":"f14517ea_2450ea4b","updated":"2023-09-20 16:08:35.000000000","message":"Well the one thing that would be necessary is amending the negative lookahead regexes, cf. the patch on master. But if we can drop them instead, that\u0027s the better solution IMO.","commit_id":"41381c80b5f3583639a9cd9bab6d208684112fd7"}]}