)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"653406300f56597cab937d76dd30a2aed9306e3a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"f6cdbd7f_b5efd760","updated":"2026-10-27 15:28:43.000000000","message":"epoxy, flamingo and gazpacho versions are somewhat okay. there are an API change, it changes a call that reported back a successful call, but failed silently in the background. Now it directly responds with an HTTP 400. This is a behaviour change, but on the border, and as far as i understand users probably could not build on the failing behaviour, so probably it makes the user experience better if the API sends an HTTP 400 earlier with a clear error message. so this is OK, even PATCH version bump is okay, though some cases it is recommended to bump MINOR version to highlight the change. anyway, as i wrote, this is OK.\n\nThe problem is though with the hibiscus stable release: first of all, there is a backward incompatible change, that is not allowed at all for projects who follow stable policy. However, Cyborg is not listed among the projects that follows stable policy [1], but it\u0027s worth to consider to revert this change, as this could impact users who has a deployed system and want to upgrade to the new stable release. If for any reason the team decides to not revert the change, then PATCH version bump is definitely not enough. These kind of changes require MAJOR version bumps, but obviously we don\u0027t have room for that on stable branches, but a MINOR version bump is strongly recommended anyway.\n\n[1] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#project-teams-which-asserted-they-follow-the-stable-branch-policy","commit_id":"4daf97156b2a97e2008436b8e1bff05b06c4b05e"},{"author":{"_account_id":12393,"name":"chandan kumar","display_name":"Chandan Kumar","email":"chkumar@redhat.com","username":"chkumar246"},"change_message_id":"c742c713bcd844646980b6d5a6444a097d2ef70b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"6847e3ed_47bfc853","updated":"2026-10-28 08:12:41.000000000","message":"lgtm for all stable releases!","commit_id":"4daf97156b2a97e2008436b8e1bff05b06c4b05e"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"e39d38ffa38ed04f5b26b425ef78af9ca18a3fc7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a1d415f6_9965b78a","in_reply_to":"e6a8ef8c_45ebba19","updated":"2026-10-27 16:33:11.000000000","message":"ACK, thanks for the explanation, yepp, the meeting log shows that the team have agreed with the PATCH version bump. LGTM then.","commit_id":"4daf97156b2a97e2008436b8e1bff05b06c4b05e"},{"author":{"_account_id":34452,"name":"Joan Gilabert","display_name":"jgilaber","email":"jgilaber@redhat.com","username":"jgilaber"},"change_message_id":"9b983199bbbba34248abd08911aae431845beb79","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"e6a8ef8c_45ebba19","in_reply_to":"f6cdbd7f_b5efd760","updated":"2026-10-27 15:49:49.000000000","message":"I initially created a minor version bump for hibiscus, but we discussed it in the cyborg IRC meeting with @smooney@redhat.com and @chkumar@redhat.com and decided to go for a bugfix since the script removed was broken since 2026.1 and not tested for 8 years, see https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cyborg/2026/cyborg.2026-10-27-14.01.log.html#l-78 for the conversation\n\nWith that said, I can revert to the original patchset for a minor version bump if that is prefered","commit_id":"4daf97156b2a97e2008436b8e1bff05b06c4b05e"}]}