)]}'
{"deliverables/xena/glance.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":9303,"name":"Abhishek Kekane","email":"akekane@redhat.com","username":"abhishekkekane"},"change_message_id":"3d7d9f1cd9b258489ded9083b3f5571a74c7583c","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"cycle-highlights:"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"  - \u0027Support for unified quotas using keystone limits\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"  - \u0027Moved policy enforcement in API layer\u0027"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"  - \u0027Secure RBAC - Experimental support for project personas for metadef APIs\u0027"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"repository-settings:"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"  openstack/glance: {}"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"releases:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"41098613_591366b0","line":11,"updated":"2021-08-31 19:57:12.000000000","message":"Secure RBAC (line #11) is still under review and expected to merge by next week.","commit_id":"987c035ab717db33890b4717dfcf04f60e6f7028"},{"author":{"_account_id":9303,"name":"Abhishek Kekane","email":"akekane@redhat.com","username":"abhishekkekane"},"change_message_id":"7cdb36afd9edaa6e76ddf1730d796c23bbc7d2ce","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"cycle-highlights:"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"  - \u0027Support for unified quotas using keystone limits\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"  - \u0027Moved policy enforcement in API layer\u0027"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"  - \u0027Secure RBAC - Experimental support for project personas for metadef APIs\u0027"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"repository-settings:"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"  openstack/glance: {}"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"releases:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"9d767a4f_7350f01a","line":11,"in_reply_to":"36ae93e4_be65d73c","updated":"2021-09-01 08:27:27.000000000","message":"Sure, I just uploaded it to follow the deadline of proposing cycle highlights.\nI can set workflow to -1 or\n\nShould I remove this now and get this merged without Secure RBAC stuff and submit different patch later to include it?","commit_id":"987c035ab717db33890b4717dfcf04f60e6f7028"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"59958e866e2497fb20935185ebffe521e1a83c12","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"cycle-highlights:"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"  - \u0027Support for unified quotas using keystone limits\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"  - \u0027Moved policy enforcement in API layer\u0027"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"  - \u0027Secure RBAC - Experimental support for project personas for metadef APIs\u0027"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"repository-settings:"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"  openstack/glance: {}"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"releases:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"36ae93e4_be65d73c","line":11,"in_reply_to":"41098613_591366b0","updated":"2021-09-01 08:06:45.000000000","message":"Please can you hold this patch until you are not sure to release the secure RBAC, to avoid announcing something erroneous.","commit_id":"987c035ab717db33890b4717dfcf04f60e6f7028"},{"author":{"_account_id":9303,"name":"Abhishek Kekane","email":"akekane@redhat.com","username":"abhishekkekane"},"change_message_id":"8961c1a9b45e8c14e276267f5ce350fdc3b972f3","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"cycle-highlights:"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"  - \u0027Support for unified quotas using keystone limits\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"  - \u0027Moved policy enforcement in API layer\u0027"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"  - \u0027Secure RBAC - Experimental support for project personas for metadef APIs\u0027"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"repository-settings:"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"  openstack/glance: {}"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"releases:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"6ded611a_91eb100a","line":11,"in_reply_to":"4c668230_6fd8a5d3","updated":"2021-09-01 08:44:01.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"987c035ab717db33890b4717dfcf04f60e6f7028"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"724d7da4497747b283e4b84d56416588dd10e2ad","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":8,"context_line":"cycle-highlights:"},{"line_number":9,"context_line":"  - \u0027Support for unified quotas using keystone limits\u0027"},{"line_number":10,"context_line":"  - \u0027Moved policy enforcement in API layer\u0027"},{"line_number":11,"context_line":"  - \u0027Secure RBAC - Experimental support for project personas for metadef APIs\u0027"},{"line_number":12,"context_line":"repository-settings:"},{"line_number":13,"context_line":"  openstack/glance: {}"},{"line_number":14,"context_line":"releases:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"4c668230_6fd8a5d3","line":11,"in_reply_to":"9d767a4f_7350f01a","updated":"2021-09-01 08:38:58.000000000","message":"It\u0027s more preferable to submit RBAC stuff with a different patch and continue this one with the things already available.","commit_id":"987c035ab717db33890b4717dfcf04f60e6f7028"}]}