)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"9d12ec240197db0d357a790997e6eea67168711d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"1dd03df1_c1ab0d11","updated":"2023-03-08 09:20:13.000000000","message":"As discussed with my teammates we won\u0027t object any release rooms for previous versions. So ignore my previous comment.","commit_id":"f7881e0d4123d6144ce67231d962ab7ee5c529f7"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"1f82a1e177381e7b0398546befa80361575eff11","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"400c348b_29932b27","updated":"2023-03-08 17:06:59.000000000","message":"Let me comment two things:\n- if a release need to be made out of 16.0.0, like 16.0.1, then it cannot be a coordinated official release, but the team needs to handle that.\n- I don\u0027t see any reason why a bug fix should land both on top of 16.0.0 and on 16.1.0. As I see the changes, there is no significant difference (at least I don\u0027t see any patch that would make a difference, that would need a distinguished \u0027bugfix\u0027 branch here), so this could be handled as one branch in my opinion:\n* 16.0.0 (original release)\n* 16.0.1 (this release)\n* 16.0.2 (the next release, containing new bugfixes)\n\nTL;DR: however, this was accepted in our discussion, I don\u0027t feel that it has any point.","commit_id":"f7881e0d4123d6144ce67231d962ab7ee5c529f7"},{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"675758105d540e9772bbd8d9217bf4e80c117c8f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"e5b07bab_0cd44531","updated":"2023-03-07 20:36:32.000000000","message":"No outstanding bifrost patches that need including in this release. Updated to minor release bump + included more recent changes in SHA. LGTM.","commit_id":"f7881e0d4123d6144ce67231d962ab7ee5c529f7"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"0c94efc89d2e3f9d31826359773c3c69d75b879e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"c9d47fff_0b284713","updated":"2023-03-08 08:49:02.000000000","message":"Same thing that with ironic-inspector, the changes landed by the proposed tag are all fixes, so I don\u0027t see reason to release a minor version here. Why are you suggesting a minor version?\n\n-1 to highlight my question.","commit_id":"f7881e0d4123d6144ce67231d962ab7ee5c529f7"}]}