)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"eff2bf6420a78a90ca3fc210430a1770d47c8986","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"36a7a0ef_285cecc8","updated":"2023-12-13 09:56:08.000000000","message":"hmm, sorry, there is a mistake in this patch as two of the projects are not QA projects, rather Oslo ones [1], hence we need an approve from @Hervé o:)\n(I think it\u0027s just easier and quicker to continue with this patch without splitting the patch up)\nThe hashes are still correct. +2. Thanks for the reviews so far.\n\n[1] as can be seen in the PTL-Approved tagging job\u0027s log:\n✕ deliverables/stein/devstack-plugin-amqp1.yaml missing PTL/liaison approval\n✓ deliverables/stein/devstack.yaml validated by gmann@ghanshyammann.com\n✓ deliverables/stein/grenade.yaml validated by gmann@ghanshyammann.com\n✕ deliverables/stein/devstack-plugin-kafka.yaml missing PTL/liaison approval","commit_id":"dcc98e0ad179385c2d8b7587d724658987fa21cd"},{"author":{"_account_id":8556,"name":"Ghanshyam Maan","display_name":"Ghanshyam Maan","email":"gmaan.os14@gmail.com","username":"ghanshyam"},"change_message_id":"9c06e6a03c64d764deff5775931c58451e0e40eb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"79c1bd8c_95dfda67","updated":"2023-12-05 15:06:21.000000000","message":"lgtm, thanks","commit_id":"dcc98e0ad179385c2d8b7587d724658987fa21cd"},{"author":{"_account_id":28522,"name":"Hervé Beraud","email":"herveberaud.pro@gmail.com","username":"hberaud"},"change_message_id":"80db053ea3bd183c28749be5bee14844380db62b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"50507a05_b534127b","in_reply_to":"36a7a0ef_285cecc8","updated":"2023-12-13 13:30:38.000000000","message":"Well, as I said in the other patch, devstack* are tagless deliverables, so I wonder if we really need the eol tag, however, if our tooling need that to allow us to delete the branch, then lets go!","commit_id":"dcc98e0ad179385c2d8b7587d724658987fa21cd"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"facedc28ec3a4323d6ce4aa9d4aa0b956b7f6a96","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"bb71f25b_702648e2","in_reply_to":"50507a05_b534127b","updated":"2023-12-13 21:23:37.000000000","message":"we do it this way since ~ocata, but yes, mainly because of our tooling and because we need an eol tag to preserve history after the branch is deleted.","commit_id":"dcc98e0ad179385c2d8b7587d724658987fa21cd"}]}
