)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"06164a8d73e86829a047859143c1d85f93e5890f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"aad0271f_098e2a1b","updated":"2024-03-26 13:20:23.000000000","message":"From a searchlight project point of view, EOL or unmaintained doesn\u0027t matter.  I think it\u0027s up to the people maintaining unmaintained/victoria whether it would be better for the branch to exist, or for it to be EOL\u0027d and deleted.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"329f0e9e11748bce14e15b24808e1262474e794c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"e39bfd0d_79df1d7e","updated":"2024-03-05 17:46:39.000000000","message":"I should also add that the searchlight project was retired during the Wallaby cycle, so the Victoria series is the final set of deliverables.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":5314,"name":"Brian Rosmaita","email":"rosmaita.fossdev@gmail.com","username":"brian-rosmaita"},"change_message_id":"9b6211e68bf7fdda0410b31ac8605399b6ecb8ec","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d67e9ca6_d0ec35c0","updated":"2024-03-05 17:44:42.000000000","message":"I think I\u0027m the only searchlight core still around.  Hashes LGTM.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"06c447198dded7677f8e0a0585bd856d0541f3b6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"5fdd1fa7_5e0e3ae1","updated":"2024-03-05 19:58:46.000000000","message":"IMO if the project is retired, it should move to EOL instead of unmaintained","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"224868018c324ff469c4cd32ee4774bdf0158eb6","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"87cda88a_fd0a8b2c","updated":"2024-03-06 11:26:48.000000000","message":"ok, let me expand my argument: the unmaintained policy states that the latest unmaintained branch decides about the fate of older branches, too. this is currently unmainted/yoga, if that gets eoled, all older unmaintained branches should automatically get eoled with it. in this case, there is no yoga branch, so this condition would never be triggered.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"bad15be09a69610c7040f2a929103690421fff31","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"73a1c021_71cbca4e","in_reply_to":"5fdd1fa7_5e0e3ae1","updated":"2024-03-06 10:53:22.000000000","message":"that is an option, but i\u0027d do it simply and blindly transitioning everything to unmaintained for now.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"945d669e6e833be18c4a194cf7e963107429a490","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"db55674a_2e19f389","in_reply_to":"aad0271f_098e2a1b","updated":"2024-03-26 16:31:43.000000000","message":"ACK, let\u0027s EOL this then.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"56ddbec9789e4c1ae538399251c89dfa674cf2b4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"455cc432_602eedf0","in_reply_to":"e39bfd0d_79df1d7e","updated":"2024-03-05 18:28:54.000000000","message":"Thanks for the review and the details Brian! Generated patch indeed lgtm. Adding procedural PTL-Approved+1 due to the above reason.","commit_id":"3ba295df4c46cac98a4c508f6b0fa499b729e4b5"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"76bb18a23146ae5e1ef5900bd4dc4bae68ea922c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"1db52ba7_1309ab53","updated":"2024-03-26 16:33:10.000000000","message":"(hashes are still correct)","commit_id":"67b1f5e44e6733546cd1b8527a70cc95b97904d8"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"945d669e6e833be18c4a194cf7e963107429a490","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"f0a65b69_f82f87f7","updated":"2024-03-26 16:31:43.000000000","message":"Adding procedural PTL-Approved+1 based on the discussion on this patch.","commit_id":"67b1f5e44e6733546cd1b8527a70cc95b97904d8"}]}