)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":23851,"name":"Riccardo Pittau","email":"elfosardo@gmail.com","username":"elfosardo"},"change_message_id":"17a865a83d79ee833ffd07f6e2412730abc9ea68","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9e2779b5_c8b5a1f4","updated":"2024-11-28 13:48:38.000000000","message":"from the discussion I see we\u0027ll solve the bifrost status in separate patches","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"81ecfad1a3a777a39c180df35afa053c81ede9ac","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"6d36f1cf_6b556435","in_reply_to":"9e2779b5_c8b5a1f4","updated":"2024-11-28 14:12:08.000000000","message":"Oh sorry, yes, probably i should have removed bifrost and continued with the transition, but anyway, let\u0027s continue like this and I\u0027ll propose an EOL patch for bifrost later on. Thanks Riccardo. (hashes are still the latest, generated patch LGTM)","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"}],"deliverables/antelope/bifrost.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":10342,"name":"Jay Faulkner","display_name":"JayF","email":"jay@jvf.cc","username":"JayF","status":"youtube.com/@oss-gr / podcast.gr-oss.io"},"change_message_id":"98c89b086199b8cb535bb835d6d57186b925ec96","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":27,"context_line":"  - name: stable/2023.1"},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"    location: 16.1.0"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"  - name: unmaintained/2023.1"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"    location: 2023.1-eom"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"release-notes: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/bifrost/2023.1.html"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"9e99bd83_8bb505ec","line":30,"updated":"2024-11-08 22:10:33.000000000","message":"The consensus of the ironic community is that this doesn\u0027t need unmaintained branches at all. Honestly, I don\u0027t remember if in practice it means \"create it and immediately retire it\" or what, but I don\u0027t think we should cut one and go straight to EOL (and that was what was discussed at the PTG and mentioned here: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/GGUFIYJJNY32HGPDCIO5D2WBQWQVGRBG/ with no (currently posted) objections.","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"87d32326d244e072a7f89f59637ec77a65f794e2","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":27,"context_line":"  - name: stable/2023.1"},{"line_number":28,"context_line":"    location: 16.1.0"},{"line_number":29,"context_line":"  - name: unmaintained/2023.1"},{"line_number":30,"context_line":"    location: 2023.1-eom"},{"line_number":31,"context_line":"release-notes: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/bifrost/2023.1.html"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"7f5b7772_31a4594b","line":30,"in_reply_to":"9e99bd83_8bb505ec","updated":"2024-11-11 16:44:05.000000000","message":"Thanks Jay, I\u0027ve replied on your mail on openstack-discuss list. If you say, that bifrost is so dependent on recent CI tools / OS / etc, that is somewhat unmaintainable, then I\u0027m not against of EOL\u0027ing it right at the end of maintenance phase. Though we have bifrost still open from zed back till victoria. So first, we have to move those branches of bifrost to End of Life.\n\nTo be honest i also don\u0027t know what is the exact process, but i guess it is not an issue to move bifrost directly to End of Life and the rest of the deliverables to Unmaintained (with separate patches).","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"}],"deliverables/antelope/ironic.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":13861,"name":"yatin","email":"ykarel@redhat.com","username":"yatinkarel"},"change_message_id":"c77013384a7d1968d61914ba0a9af8e0d7605764","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":38,"context_line":"  - version: 2023.1-eom"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    projects:"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"      - repo: openstack/ironic"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"        hash: cca24af03b7e04ef52921c9226528d8c5f6c44a6"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"branches:"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"  - name: bugfix/21.2"},{"line_number":44,"context_line":"    location: 21.2.0"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"4a28d22c_f8e3f607","line":41,"updated":"2024-11-18 08:37:03.000000000","message":"would be good to include the CI fixes for 2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic/+/934036","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"},{"author":{"_account_id":13861,"name":"yatin","email":"ykarel@redhat.com","username":"yatinkarel"},"change_message_id":"f9cab30dba3f8f9a64af6e3263ee77700a7cd13a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":38,"context_line":"  - version: 2023.1-eom"},{"line_number":39,"context_line":"    projects:"},{"line_number":40,"context_line":"      - repo: openstack/ironic"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"        hash: cca24af03b7e04ef52921c9226528d8c5f6c44a6"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"branches:"},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"  - name: bugfix/21.2"},{"line_number":44,"context_line":"    location: 21.2.0"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"85fa244f_0a20f874","line":41,"in_reply_to":"4a28d22c_f8e3f607","updated":"2024-11-26 06:43:44.000000000","message":"can\u0027t get that in, need to get this merged first to cut unmaintained/2023.1 for ironic.","commit_id":"00f14f90c32d676324304ef4abb7a2da35daa7ad"}]}