)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"1ef8770ab51cb1547acba37998688a069b5511f6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2bfa80e5_d46a621d","updated":"2024-11-15 16:42:17.000000000","message":"Should we also EOL unmaintained/victoria of Heat, because the other repos of heat are transitioned to EOL by this change ?","commit_id":"6db5869f55468844a17c4695ee74cb8d3db94e7f"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"ab2f586febeb7cc926ed46862bd15875c73c9286","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8e34c55f_cbf4052e","in_reply_to":"26645cef_1ef2ea74","updated":"2024-11-18 20:07:33.000000000","message":"The policy just talks about branches, which I interpret as actual git branches per repo, it doesn\u0027t say anything about combined handling and pretty surely we do not want to enforce treating all deliverables the same for all project teams. see for example the recent discussion on how the ironic team want to handle bifrost differently from other repos.\n\nso if you want to have this for heat, you\u0027ll have to propose the appropriate patches yourself, I\u0027m fine to drop heat deliverables from this patch stack if you want to do it all in a single patch. or you could spec and implement some tooling that would allow projects to specify such dependencies in a way that can be dealt with automatically, but I\u0027m not sure that that would be time well spent","commit_id":"6db5869f55468844a17c4695ee74cb8d3db94e7f"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"8f73f7813d01a160d9c6f3921598432509fc9c39","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"4db3a96e_b4094515","in_reply_to":"2bfa80e5_d46a621d","updated":"2024-11-15 16:57:07.000000000","message":"this patch is essentially just autogenerated from a gerrit query based on the criterium mentioned in the commit message, I would like to keep it that way. if you want to EOL additional repos, feel free to do so in a follow-up","commit_id":"6db5869f55468844a17c4695ee74cb8d3db94e7f"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"0577f70f38a78e89b1575b2da46b9d70db6ef944","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"26645cef_1ef2ea74","in_reply_to":"4db3a96e_b4094515","updated":"2024-11-17 08:42:33.000000000","message":"My main concern is that retiring a project incompletely may cause a mess and kill people who may want to maintain that branch. For example stable/victoria heat job expects that stable/victoria exist for python-heatclient and retiring only python-heatclient effectively kills heat. We should retire all repositories of one project or keep them completely.\n\nI agree I can take care of heat in follow-up but again I don\u0027t think it\u0027s correct that we retire any project incompletely by this change.","commit_id":"6db5869f55468844a17c4695ee74cb8d3db94e7f"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"3d5dc6b924810adf2147a383774c4261c35d8876","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"7a2c0907_5bd3e4cb","in_reply_to":"8e34c55f_cbf4052e","updated":"2024-11-19 08:30:46.000000000","message":"bifrost is in a different situation because it is not tightly coupled with the other repos.\n\nI\u0027ll not block this, but I\u0027ll not give +1 on this either because I believe the decision should be made by unmaintained cores. IIUC the concept of unmaintained branches is \"do not care if you don\u0027t care\" and I have zero intention to maintain unmaintaied branches.","commit_id":"6db5869f55468844a17c4695ee74cb8d3db94e7f"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"2f4653bbb3be585f1eeab4b63b0782f667e91495","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"10c2c8e8_4cdfe1f5","updated":"2024-11-26 09:11:11.000000000","message":"I agree most of them, but for some i\u0027d rather fix the gate to keep it open for possible future backports. I\u0027ll update the patch later.","commit_id":"0f48a5c8ab34931fd9d9cbc55d1e5fb120e134ff"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"33bab72d6d7e3d1d7f2df2071c86856218bd0270","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"91f7fa4a_5fd6d32f","updated":"2024-11-30 07:41:24.000000000","message":"overriding PTL-approval flag since this patch includes retired projects","commit_id":"0f48a5c8ab34931fd9d9cbc55d1e5fb120e134ff"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"33bab72d6d7e3d1d7f2df2071c86856218bd0270","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"1df24bdb_c6ee8cee","in_reply_to":"10c2c8e8_4cdfe1f5","updated":"2024-11-30 07:41:24.000000000","message":"Getting the basic housekeeping tasks done is IMO a non-negotiable requirement for keeping branches alive. If you want to remove some of them, please make sure that the condition mentioned in the commit message is satisfied.\n\nI would also like to avoid for this cleanup to be delayed ever again, can we agree on a deadline, say Dec 4, to get this done?","commit_id":"0f48a5c8ab34931fd9d9cbc55d1e5fb120e134ff"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"8d326224afae67e69dfa30eefb6de2886331dae9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"3fe0c083_14a46a13","updated":"2024-12-09 14:06:41.000000000","message":"I\u0027ve only removed some project from the list, so this should be good to go. Adding back PTL-Approved+1.","commit_id":"a38ad94493a7e5167d612bb6acbbb758b634b2d4"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"6c06c0ee7a63c3724bac7c8be9bb67e7e735c67f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"084a35ce_1436b772","updated":"2024-12-10 07:15:52.000000000","message":"ok, let\u0027s go ahead with this at least, will update the remainder of the stack accordingly once this is merged","commit_id":"a38ad94493a7e5167d612bb6acbbb758b634b2d4"}]}