)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"3e04a1ff310eeb7b9fd23bd9ca318ae6cb9f999b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"c6d1d1b6_46d037a8","updated":"2024-12-06 14:05:35.000000000","message":"Adding procedural PTL-Approved+1. I\u0027ve tested the code locally and worked well. Merge this to fix new-release command for cycle independent projects quickly.","commit_id":"71c835872ab97cab918d055a515822704ed91307"},{"author":{"_account_id":308,"name":"Thierry Carrez","email":"thierry@openstack.org","username":"ttx"},"change_message_id":"26bba5e126e0ec0209c4b7b3535e6a47c26081a4","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b2b582ef_42477898","updated":"2025-01-30 13:23:50.000000000","message":"Fine with it as is","commit_id":"71c835872ab97cab918d055a515822704ed91307"}],"openstack_releases/cmds/new_release.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"cb9ad602aa2510fdfed14e26d73ec1a982d2b5ee","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":170,"context_line":"    naming style: stable/2023.1 (versus the old style: stable/zed)."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"    \"\"\""},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"    series_status_data \u003d series_status.SeriesStatus.default()"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"    return series_status_data[series].release_id"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":""},{"line_number":175,"context_line":""},{"line_number":176,"context_line":"def main():"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"68e33704_29449eb4","line":173,"updated":"2024-12-11 06:15:00.000000000","message":"how about fixing the issue at the root instead with something like:\n\n```suggestion\n    try:\n        return series_status_data[series].release_id\n    except KeyError:\n        return series\n```","commit_id":"71c835872ab97cab918d055a515822704ed91307"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"b6ecf85326d19b74b768f1c00622bc6605a01cf4","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":170,"context_line":"    naming style: stable/2023.1 (versus the old style: stable/zed)."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"    \"\"\""},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"    series_status_data \u003d series_status.SeriesStatus.default()"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"    return series_status_data[series].release_id"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":""},{"line_number":175,"context_line":""},{"line_number":176,"context_line":"def main():"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"cedab6ce_888e8ef9","line":173,"in_reply_to":"68e33704_29449eb4","updated":"2025-01-30 12:03:43.000000000","message":"this definitely has smaller code footprint, but i don\u0027t like it as much as there is no such stable branch ID as \"_independent\" so why should we pass that back? to me it makes more sense to just skip checking for branch ID in case of projects with independent release model.\n\nNevertheless, if you insist to this fix, I\u0027m not completely against this. This is not a big deal, let\u0027s just fix it either way.","commit_id":"71c835872ab97cab918d055a515822704ed91307"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"46cbbc92c472ed454cb63e567d432e1a4306102f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":170,"context_line":"    naming style: stable/2023.1 (versus the old style: stable/zed)."},{"line_number":171,"context_line":"    \"\"\""},{"line_number":172,"context_line":"    series_status_data \u003d series_status.SeriesStatus.default()"},{"line_number":173,"context_line":"    return series_status_data[series].release_id"},{"line_number":174,"context_line":""},{"line_number":175,"context_line":""},{"line_number":176,"context_line":"def main():"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"488251ff_667552e3","line":173,"in_reply_to":"cedab6ce_888e8ef9","updated":"2025-01-31 10:27:21.000000000","message":"ok, I can agree with that, so let\u0027s keep it as proposed","commit_id":"71c835872ab97cab918d055a515822704ed91307"}]}