)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"b85fe569f7f5362dc5799d81a0cc9a25fc73b7e8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"a333294b_234d70c7","updated":"2022-01-25 18:05:48.000000000","message":"\u003e Patch Set 1:\n\u003e \n\u003e I\u0027m guessing that this would have caught the dnspython issue (why should we add it?)\n\nYes, this would have caught the bug in the dnspython 2.2.0 UC updated.","commit_id":"3dd841da1f50f2cf1bffe981d7c9034100078139"},{"author":{"_account_id":11628,"name":"Michael Johnson","email":"johnsomor@gmail.com","username":"johnsom"},"change_message_id":"824087eba36aeb06c598d8db43f95f1c50debc17","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"2f5e5c53_e007dd93","updated":"2022-01-25 01:58:04.000000000","message":"recheck\nWas too fast on this patch, the dnspython 2.2.0 block wasn\u0027t merged","commit_id":"3dd841da1f50f2cf1bffe981d7c9034100078139"}]}
