)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"2bdf014f373f78334f17ce762cb305f082b11784","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"b1bf8814_67ded110","updated":"2022-05-23 16:32:17.000000000","message":"ok so this is going to fail becasue the tepest job is using master for the requiremetns in the venv\n\ni could work around that but im testing if using the constraitf file form this patch actully resolved locally.\nits currenlty trying older version fo oslo.log but its takeing some time so im not sure this is what we want to even if pinning worked.\n\nhttps://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/raw/commit/ab8ef44b509fa30d2de71a52977951576c42ae2f/upper-constraints.txt\n\ngeneral question however do we expect the tempest vemnv to use the upper constratis under test or not?\n\ngiven tempest is pinend on stable ussuri i expected it to at least use ussuri not master.","commit_id":"ab8ef44b509fa30d2de71a52977951576c42ae2f"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"079e4f4bff8a71555d2de8e65f86d3e4f90d52b5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"a98e0cb8_c6955895","updated":"2022-05-23 17:32:58.000000000","message":"I\u0027m not sure this is what we want. I mean, so far we did directly the opposite and pin tempest for branches in Extended Maintenance (see \u003cseries\u003e-last tags in tempest).\nAlso, we have now a problem where it tempest was installed on train with upper constraints from master, see the fix for that [1]\n\n[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/842813","commit_id":"daeebdb2c6e277c3e45b688403fd6b49fec6eab5"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"847b9f79f4a8effdf766179043b7420074496920","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":2,"id":"8c18189b_523bcad9","in_reply_to":"a98e0cb8_c6955895","updated":"2022-05-23 20:33:26.000000000","message":"well without backporting all the sshable fixes and doing new relase for the em branche or creat em branch of tempest we basically need to use newer version.\n\ni think we really need to conintue to use master tempest on em barnches or drop support for them when support is dropped in tempest.\n\nwe can maintain the em barnaches if we are pinned to old tempest unless we have a way to fix issue via new releases.","commit_id":"daeebdb2c6e277c3e45b688403fd6b49fec6eab5"}]}