)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"cc8f3f05fb93edbdb3dc9ec49c593a3be1e022b9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d849343e_807cd781","updated":"2023-10-27 11:18:38.000000000","message":"As discussed in the IRC channel, it seems weird that on one hand gnocchi choose to move out of openstack governance, while on the other hand now requirements should adopt the upper bounds it introduces due to being badly maintained.\n\nThere have been other solutions proposed like installing gnocchi in a dedicated environment or maybe even container, which I would prefer to be pursued first.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":16137,"name":"Tobias Urdin","email":"tobias.urdin@binero.com","username":"tobasco"},"change_message_id":"95f00ccdbbba1055e85a86ee80a6eee00553397d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"d5b6220f_51c0916c","updated":"2023-11-03 14:42:00.000000000","message":"I\u0027ve unpinned Gnocchi on master.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"9beb78932a9e4b7f436ee19dae2196dc39d28faa","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"699dbb7c_d050525f","updated":"2023-10-18 03:46:55.000000000","message":"Unpin is being worked on in https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/pull/1347 .","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":4264,"name":"Matthias Runge","email":"mrunge@redhat.com","username":"mrunge"},"change_message_id":"c5b86b166bbc1d3f5c67d7997e927f7b9e8344e6","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"da6f1c32_b8d99187","in_reply_to":"076ad812_809fdc27","updated":"2023-10-30 10:00:19.000000000","message":"I understand the reasoning here. However, that decision has been made ages ago and nobody here in telemetry was active at that time (in telemetry); people involved in telemetry back then are no longer involved.\n\nThere was a regression introduced in pyparsing https://github.com/pyparsing/pyparsing/issues/504 that is hitting gnocchi. There is a promise to fix, but it\u0027s taking time.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":9816,"name":"Takashi Kajinami","email":"kajinamit@oss.nttdata.com","username":"kajinamit"},"change_message_id":"bd758697ac9d7e9f3fb2343200679e4f89f61181","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"ca3711de_116f9049","in_reply_to":"8261c3b8_4dd49c4c","updated":"2023-11-06 09:53:07.000000000","message":"I do understand the frustration caused by the unfortunate decision by gnocchi to be separate from openstack governance, but the reality is that gnocchi is still essential to telemetry projects.\n\nAs Matthius mentioned there is a work to replace it, but until it becomes truly viable replacement we have to maintain a working set, otherwise telemetry is completely useless IMO.\n\nUsing a separate installation is a solution for our testing, but does not resolve the issue in all deployment pattern, especially ones using packaging, as there are not dependency version we can use to make both openstack and gnocchi work in a node.\n\nI\u0027ll abandon this as the original issue was resolved by gnocchi, but I\u0027d like to hightlight the reality that \"keep gnocchi away\" eventually means we can\u0027t maintain telemetry.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":4264,"name":"Matthias Runge","email":"mrunge@redhat.com","username":"mrunge"},"change_message_id":"13333fb01c6ecd1cb4399d74a0e6fad7e09bcd1b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8261c3b8_4dd49c4c","in_reply_to":"9a8746fb_237da94f","updated":"2023-11-02 10:42:17.000000000","message":"My team is working on adding prometheus as TSDB and a replacement for gnocchi. However, before we can drop gnocchi, I\u0027d prefer to have both working at the same time during a short period of time and not drop one and then add the next. In that case, we\u0027d have a time where we have nothing.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":11904,"name":"Sean McGinnis","email":"sean.mcginnis@gmail.com","username":"SeanM"},"change_message_id":"d0af3fc070464911595d1d8c744e7ef22e280e6d","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"076ad812_809fdc27","in_reply_to":"d849343e_807cd781","updated":"2023-10-27 12:36:40.000000000","message":"\u003e move out of openstack governance\n\nAgree, openstack-requirements are for projects under OpenStack governance. Constraints should not be modified to support non-governed projects.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"a5781285249e8df2a7e85bbabb5607b944e040f7","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"9a8746fb_237da94f","in_reply_to":"da6f1c32_b8d99187","updated":"2023-11-02 07:59:10.000000000","message":"There hasn\u0027t been much progress yet on the linked fix for gnocchi, one could start to wonder whether it can be considered a healthy project and should be in openstack requirements at all. Seeing that gnocchi is already working to introduce the next version pin https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/pull/1354 , I still think looking into doing a separate installation for it would likely be worthwhile.\n\nNote also that a pin as proposed here causes a lot of maintenance effort as it has to be manually kept in place for every weekly requirements update.","commit_id":"3ddd8930f694306f8e1b2cddaefd341de5ed7dab"}]}