)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":11904,"name":"Sean McGinnis","email":"sean.mcginnis@gmail.com","username":"SeanM"},"change_message_id":"ab403324f27831f9c4650b8f2fda197e8e27b375","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":4,"id":"b973622a_76c78c5c","updated":"2024-04-16 18:19:08.000000000","message":"Nice!","commit_id":"f06e5a59a918fbb08451c29067682c5c50c10dba"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"c2b9462be564e3bc3fb524f99ef9ac5859f610cc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"5f019107_e732a956","updated":"2024-04-17 12:46:56.000000000","message":"Would it make sense to split this into two parts, so that the reordering commit could be added to .git-blame-ignore-revs ?\n\nThx for adding the verification snippet.","commit_id":"258e59dd69257376d2516b57a471314ca5661911"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"18afb88aed7086a6d8b72273de3eae650c856060","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":5,"id":"6c47d0eb_039d1538","in_reply_to":"5f019107_e732a956","updated":"2024-04-17 14:25:54.000000000","message":"I\u0027d initially done that, but tbh the grouping reorders stuff so much that there\u0027s no real advantage to it: it simply makes rebasing harder.","commit_id":"258e59dd69257376d2516b57a471314ca5661911"}],"global-requirements.txt":[{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"3eb4883e0ff508b932ee178fbc6ee2e7a005cd58","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":325,"context_line":""},{"line_number":326,"context_line":"# NOTE(tonyb): Generally adding OpenSatck services isn\u0027t allowed but some consumers of ceilometer"},{"line_number":327,"context_line":"# use it like a library so until there is a ceilometer-lib (or similar) this is our best option."},{"line_number":328,"context_line":"ceilometer  # Apache-2.0"},{"line_number":329,"context_line":""},{"line_number":330,"context_line":"# NOTE(anilvenkata): This is required for profiling oslo.service processes"},{"line_number":331,"context_line":"Yappi!\u003d0.98,!\u003d0.99  # MIT"}],"source_content_type":"text/plain","patch_set":2,"id":"15ab06a9_17e4ad7c","line":328,"updated":"2024-04-07 07:24:35.000000000","message":"This seems to be a similar case like for neutron/networking projects. Maybe it makes sense to have a dedicated section for these?\n\nOr even have a section for all projects under OpenStack governance, matching how we would be grouping imports?","commit_id":"dbeeaaa0668e026743a55489fb07ea33a03488b2"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"890d9251b49463e3696c8c9ffb77c0c4f37ef789","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":325,"context_line":""},{"line_number":326,"context_line":"# NOTE(tonyb): Generally adding OpenSatck services isn\u0027t allowed but some consumers of ceilometer"},{"line_number":327,"context_line":"# use it like a library so until there is a ceilometer-lib (or similar) this is our best option."},{"line_number":328,"context_line":"ceilometer  # Apache-2.0"},{"line_number":329,"context_line":""},{"line_number":330,"context_line":"# NOTE(anilvenkata): This is required for profiling oslo.service processes"},{"line_number":331,"context_line":"Yappi!\u003d0.98,!\u003d0.99  # MIT"}],"source_content_type":"text/plain","patch_set":2,"id":"8aa729e7_5a001f1c","line":328,"in_reply_to":"15ab06a9_17e4ad7c","updated":"2024-04-16 16:57:03.000000000","message":"Done","commit_id":"dbeeaaa0668e026743a55489fb07ea33a03488b2"}]}