)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"82266c6c97c6ab69e055dfe907bff55a650c046f","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"4818da24_f589c52f","updated":"2026-02-10 15:19:58.000000000","message":"Assuming we get CI working","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":13252,"name":"Dr. Jens Harbott","display_name":"Jens Harbott (frickler)","email":"frickler@offenerstapel.de","username":"jrosenboom"},"change_message_id":"51b1c26c143669d10db969b964dde3e7e23f106a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"b2f91a1c_c2380d50","updated":"2026-02-11 15:51:59.000000000","message":"I\u0027m not sure whether all these backports are really necessary? I agree with elod that a lighter version for stable branches could be preferred.\n\nalso, do we need a patch to u-c to verify that this really fixes all the cross jobs, too?","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":32704,"name":"Alfredo Garcia","display_name":"Alfredo Garcia","email":"alfrgarc@redhat.com","username":"alfrgarc","status":"Senior Software Quality Engineer @ Red Hat"},"change_message_id":"09880ac789eef32a8fc79e9f3f1c16a27fdac349","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"89d2edb5_d0d680e6","updated":"2026-02-11 14:09:50.000000000","message":"The depends on PR has been merged and the code changes are consistent with Tempest\u0027s logic and style. LGTM","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"83d0473e43715a06ae61fbc9dc366980406c590c","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"acc2e912_4732a7e9","updated":"2026-02-10 15:16:30.000000000","message":"recheck dep updated","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"61deb29ebcc9e27be33dfd49e703d66abecd41b8","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"bf0156de_29e9c6a6","updated":"2026-02-11 12:16:26.000000000","message":"the depend on is now merged so if we are ok with this approch to the pkg_resouces issue it woudl be good to unblock the stable gates (without this the requirement_check job fails)","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":15334,"name":"Stephen Finucane","display_name":"stephenfin","email":"stephenfin@redhat.com","username":"sfinucan"},"change_message_id":"5f423896a48081cbc76edd3338d522eeab56f906","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"7380f045_14a64a66","in_reply_to":"6a5e28c2_c4fb08c9","updated":"2026-02-11 16:28:07.000000000","message":"Yeah, I suspect it would be safer to backport all commits as they merged on stable rather than attempting to re-engineer things to avoid some of them. It will also make backporting of future bug fixes easier.","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":11604,"name":"sean mooney","email":"smooney@redhat.com","username":"sean-k-mooney"},"change_message_id":"b642f5d6426c402dfafd6c6f684ec637bc6d825e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"6a5e28c2_c4fb08c9","in_reply_to":"b2f91a1c_c2380d50","updated":"2026-02-11 16:24:26.000000000","message":"the first commit is to avoid a merge conflict the 2nd and 3rd commit are the removal of pkg_resouces usage\n\nthis isnet nessiarlly intened to fix all impacted cross job i.e. the other porjects unit tests if they have a build or runtime dep on pkg_resoruces\n\nThis is intended to fix the requirements_check job and to remove the runtime usage of pkg_resources in the requriement repo.","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"},{"author":{"_account_id":17685,"name":"Elod Illes","email":"elod.illes@est.tech","username":"elod.illes"},"change_message_id":"f9a572776b703d37a6ddd96928d1ccea95b27bbb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":3,"id":"f5b2a007_15928a3d","in_reply_to":"bf0156de_29e9c6a6","updated":"2026-02-11 12:35:28.000000000","message":"as I said on IRC yesterday: i\u0027d rather just pin setuptools for stable/2025.* branches of requirements, especially as this only fixes the base jobs of requirements repo and the gate will be still broken as cross-* jobs will still fail with `missing \"pkg_resources\" module`.\n\nanyway, the CI is green here, and this approach also looks feasible, so why not. (giving +1 as i\u0027m not a requirements team member)","commit_id":"ed0f971305bee6b48fb803e479c62ab0118c15be"}]}