)]}'
{"shade/openstackcloud.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":14119,"name":"Sam Yaple","email":"sam+git@yaple.net","username":"SamYaple"},"change_message_id":"d14e945d7b2eba05c2c140c5d7ce4e42e96b8094","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1675,"context_line":"        return True"},{"line_number":1676,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1677,"context_line":"    def create_network(self, name, shared\u003dFalse, admin_state_up\u003dTrue,"},{"line_number":1678,"context_line":"                       external\u003dFalse, provider\u003dNone, tenant_id\u003dNone):"},{"line_number":1679,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Create a network."},{"line_number":1680,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1681,"context_line":"        :param string name: Name of the network being created."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"7af24918_bd47541c","line":1678,"updated":"2016-03-06 20:50:50.000000000","message":"do we want to use the tenant_id semantic, or project_id? while the neutron api is still calling it tenant_id, I would think shade should standardize on project_id\n\nthoughts?","commit_id":"bff75c5c85fc8151793aa74ccce0475bc1a5c855"},{"author":{"_account_id":6133,"name":"yolanda.robla","email":"yroblamo@redhat.com","username":"yolanda.robla"},"change_message_id":"721ac3cd70640e33fdbcd18662fa08ca5320823e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1675,"context_line":"        return True"},{"line_number":1676,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1677,"context_line":"    def create_network(self, name, shared\u003dFalse, admin_state_up\u003dTrue,"},{"line_number":1678,"context_line":"                       external\u003dFalse, provider\u003dNone, tenant_id\u003dNone):"},{"line_number":1679,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Create a network."},{"line_number":1680,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1681,"context_line":"        :param string name: Name of the network being created."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"5aef4532_5409e42b","line":1678,"in_reply_to":"7af24918_bd47541c","updated":"2016-03-07 13:28:03.000000000","message":"I agree on calling that project_id, seems the standard naming now","commit_id":"bff75c5c85fc8151793aa74ccce0475bc1a5c855"},{"author":{"_account_id":3099,"name":"David Shrewsbury","email":"dshrewsb@redhat.com","username":"dshrews"},"change_message_id":"e3bef044e7b99a5db3f1dfaad8bfb34e347c521a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1686,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1687,"context_line":"           { \u0027network_type\u0027: \u0027vlan\u0027, \u0027segmentation_id\u0027: \u0027vlan1\u0027 }"},{"line_number":1688,"context_line":"        :param string project_id: Specify the project ID this network"},{"line_number":1689,"context_line":"        will be created on (admin-only)."},{"line_number":1690,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1691,"context_line":"        :returns: The network object."},{"line_number":1692,"context_line":"        :raises: OpenStackCloudException on operation error."}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":4,"id":"5aef4532_b9f733f4","line":1689,"updated":"2016-03-08 18:19:41.000000000","message":"I believe indenting this second line will make the documentation output correctly. See:\n\nhttp://docs-draft.openstack.org/66/288166/4/check/gate-shade-docs/5faee4a//doc/build/html/usage.html#shade.OpenStackCloud.create_network","commit_id":"105ff01d2ffe977a4836dd519935de46aedccb0a"}],"shade/tests/unit/test_network.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":14119,"name":"Sam Yaple","email":"sam+git@yaple.net","username":"SamYaple"},"change_message_id":"2184e14d4c130e2bca18c6a961bd01dcfa75342b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":40,"context_line":"    def test_create_network_specific_tenant(self, mock_neutron):"},{"line_number":41,"context_line":"        self.cloud.create_network(\"netname\", project_id\u003d\"project_id_value\")"},{"line_number":42,"context_line":"        mock_neutron.create_network.assert_called_with("},{"line_number":43,"context_line":"            body\u003ddict("},{"line_number":44,"context_line":"                network\u003ddict("},{"line_number":45,"context_line":"                    name\u003d\u0027netname\u0027,"},{"line_number":46,"context_line":"                    shared\u003dFalse,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":5,"id":"5aef4532_45e719b0","line":43,"updated":"2016-03-08 21:46:52.000000000","message":"not a big fan of dict() vs {} but its been mixed through these tests so this should be fine","commit_id":"d0709ead25dc5d5e19445f451e2380db004eb37f"}]}