)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":23851,"name":"Riccardo Pittau","email":"elfosardo@gmail.com","username":"elfosardo"},"change_message_id":"a7126f90903d05471a407e674b677ed80f4fce1a","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"8289bf28_77a1aa38","updated":"2022-04-06 13:19:42.000000000","message":"need to bump jinja2 as we did for ironic :/","commit_id":"8eea6be3858ede1678fc57ec5b357ca3604cb45f"},{"author":{"_account_id":23851,"name":"Riccardo Pittau","email":"elfosardo@gmail.com","username":"elfosardo"},"change_message_id":"86ebd8d9699c740aa6f8ba1feb92bec200d5834b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":6,"id":"a4fe6be9_2c212bc2","updated":"2022-04-06 16:38:28.000000000","message":"Dmitry, this should work with a very smaller change, at least from what I tested locally\nhere\u0027s the list of version bumps:\nitsdangerous\u003d\u003d2.0.1\nJinja2\u003d\u003d3.0.0\nlibvirt-python\u003d\u003d7.6.0\noslo.config\u003d\u003d6.3.0\noslo.log\u003d\u003d3.39.2\nwerkzeug\u003d\u003d2.0.3\n","commit_id":"5d1620500402544339d785012db5cc149b4c0deb"},{"author":{"_account_id":10239,"name":"Dmitry Tantsur","email":"dtantsur@protonmail.com","username":"dtantsur"},"change_message_id":"c5a625b34c8176a79358a58ed8a1d49dcfbdc173","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":6,"id":"f0c85206_53b46611","updated":"2022-04-07 15:47:30.000000000","message":"Sushy will get broken in its turn :) There is no guarantee that these versions will work with *any* future versions of their dependencies.","commit_id":"5d1620500402544339d785012db5cc149b4c0deb"},{"author":{"_account_id":10239,"name":"Dmitry Tantsur","email":"dtantsur@protonmail.com","username":"dtantsur"},"change_message_id":"429f47728a597cc5725787a382f659b8935569bb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":6,"id":"71d11abe_e22c8910","updated":"2022-04-07 11:02:33.000000000","message":"We need to provide the whole set of dependencies, otherwise we\u0027re going to be broken again soon.\n\nThe alternative is to stop lower-constraints testing here.","commit_id":"5d1620500402544339d785012db5cc149b4c0deb"},{"author":{"_account_id":23851,"name":"Riccardo Pittau","email":"elfosardo@gmail.com","username":"elfosardo"},"change_message_id":"6fa4f7e2594c068cc50e83ed7368226c3de5f294","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":6,"id":"7ac3ffd3_22e96e7b","in_reply_to":"71d11abe_e22c8910","updated":"2022-04-07 12:57:34.000000000","message":"I think we don\u0027t need to do this in all cases, look at sushy for example https://opendev.org/openstack/sushy/src/branch/master/lower-constraints.txt","commit_id":"5d1620500402544339d785012db5cc149b4c0deb"}]}