)]}'
{"/PATCHSET_LEVEL":[{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"9bf2bce741c68fb359097464133f4cdc0c7165eb","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[],"source_content_type":"","patch_set":1,"id":"283a2fae_877ea89d","updated":"2026-10-19 18:27:40.000000000","message":"check experimental","commit_id":"4d7c77ff18bb485359075104bb2b71a85f0e9d4b"}],"releasenotes/notes/release-2.38.3-3906eb686f520e40.yaml":[{"author":{"_account_id":34930,"name":"Jianjian Huo","email":"jhuo@nvidia.com","username":"jhuo"},"change_message_id":"f63ad3c2966c9883d72322b4447b489aa89ed279","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1,"context_line":"---"},{"line_number":2,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    Fix how s3api copies multipart uploads, both for ``CopyObject`` and"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"5e4551f8_4b94d71d","line":1,"updated":"2026-10-20 00:16:16.000000000","message":"Claude suggested a nit: \n```\nadds a Reno security note for CVE-2026-97149 and states \nexplicitly that the fix first shipped in 2.38.2\n```\n\nso that\u0027ll be below section before here\n```\n---\nsecurity:\n  - |\n    Swift 2.38.2 blocks object copies through PUT TempURLs.\n    This fixes CVE-2026-97149.\n```","commit_id":"4d7c77ff18bb485359075104bb2b71a85f0e9d4b"},{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"69d09cf6f982809641ec6cf4b9f535004a3db13e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1,"context_line":"---"},{"line_number":2,"context_line":"fixes:"},{"line_number":3,"context_line":"  - |"},{"line_number":4,"context_line":"    Fix how s3api copies multipart uploads, both for ``CopyObject`` and"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-yaml","patch_set":1,"id":"13c5ef02_2103c0e3","line":1,"in_reply_to":"5e4551f8_4b94d71d","updated":"2026-10-20 04:34:02.000000000","message":"Good call -- I was debating about how best to handle that one since I missed the original window. Adding the note but calling out that it was fixed in a different version seems reasonable here.","commit_id":"4d7c77ff18bb485359075104bb2b71a85f0e9d4b"}]}
