)]}'
{"swift/proxy/controllers/base.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":1179,"name":"Clay Gerrard","email":"clay.gerrard@gmail.com","username":"clay-gerrard"},"change_message_id":"0d2b533f937e2d23459a226e95f324b176fb6539","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1014,"context_line":"            info[\u0027partition\u0027] \u003d part"},{"line_number":1015,"context_line":"            info[\u0027nodes\u0027] \u003d nodes"},{"line_number":1016,"context_line":"        if info.get(\u0027storage_policy\u0027) is None:"},{"line_number":1017,"context_line":"            info[\u0027storage_policy\u0027] \u003d 0"},{"line_number":1018,"context_line":"        return info"},{"line_number":1019,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1020,"context_line":"    def _make_request(self, nodes, part, method, path, headers, query,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"9a80dd14_75024170","line":1017,"updated":"2015-03-06 18:56:48.000000000","message":"yeah this was a \"bug\" sort of... if the container_info 404\u0027s the returned info wouldn\u0027t have the storage_policy key - which... you know, no one looks at it but...  anyway it was exposed by the test refactoring - seems better for container_info to just always have the key.","commit_id":"b43b88ffc8075b73226cc38b0bb4dac54f54e332"}]}