)]}'
{"test/functional/tests.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":8542,"name":"Prashanth Pai","email":"ppai@redhat.com","username":"pai"},"change_message_id":"1f1768c0f0bf36418890bdeb326e942dcefa4a1b","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1374,"context_line":"        data \u003d file_item.write_random("},{"line_number":1375,"context_line":"            file_length, hdrs\u003d{\"Content-Type\": \"lovecraft/rugose\"})"},{"line_number":1376,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1377,"context_line":"        for i in range(0, file_length, range_size):"},{"line_number":1378,"context_line":"            range_string \u003d \u0027bytes\u003d%d-%d,%d-%d,%d-%d\u0027 % ("},{"line_number":1379,"context_line":"                i, i + subrange_size - 1,"},{"line_number":1380,"context_line":"                i + 2 * subrange_size, i + 3 * subrange_size - 1,"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"baa041b7_1c97b191","line":1377,"updated":"2015-04-02 07:36:03.000000000","message":"nit: s/range/xrange","commit_id":"d397a811f158f9aa38c7464a4f1147feeaa340a2"},{"author":{"_account_id":12193,"name":"Hisashi Osanai","email":"osanai.hisashi@jp.fujitsu.com","username":"ho"},"change_message_id":"59bf1ceb7054ce238577c0e027665a69cd5530fa","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1457,"context_line":"        hdrs \u003d {\u0027Range\u0027: range_string}"},{"line_number":1458,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1459,"context_line":"        self.assertRaises(ResponseError, file_item.read, hdrs\u003dhdrs)"},{"line_number":1460,"context_line":"        self.assert_status(416)"},{"line_number":1461,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1462,"context_line":"    def testRangedGetsWithLWSinHeader(self):"},{"line_number":1463,"context_line":"        file_length \u003d 10000"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"baa041b7_5335fbf4","line":1460,"updated":"2015-04-03 10:56:35.000000000","message":"RFC2616 14.16\nA server sending a response with status code 416 (Requested range not satisfiable) SHOULD include a Content-Range field with a byte-range-resp-spec of \"*\".\n\nIs it better to include Content-Range in the response?\nRFC uses \u0027SHOULD\u0027 not \u0027MUST\u0027 so I just want to know whether we have a reason or not.","commit_id":"d397a811f158f9aa38c7464a4f1147feeaa340a2"}]}