)]}'
{"swift/proxy/controllers/obj.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":12193,"name":"Hisashi Osanai","email":"osanai.hisashi@jp.fujitsu.com","username":"ho"},"change_message_id":"2c24a81250f2488867bb2d0dc690b6ffe15c6cc9","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":823,"context_line":"        #       keep the code depends on evnetlet.posthooks sequence, IMHO."},{"line_number":824,"context_line":"        #       However, creating a new sub request might"},{"line_number":825,"context_line":"        #       cause the possibility to hide some bugs behindes the request"},{"line_number":826,"context_line":"        #       so that we should discuss whichi is suitable (new-sub-request"},{"line_number":827,"context_line":"        #       vs re-write-existing-request) for Swift. [kota_]"},{"line_number":828,"context_line":"        req.method \u003d \u0027PUT\u0027"},{"line_number":829,"context_line":"        req.path_info \u003d \u0027/v1/%s/%s/%s\u0027 % \\"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"da20952f_bb6a4119","line":826,"updated":"2015-08-26 23:34:49.000000000","message":"s/whichi/which/","commit_id":"ae129bf5e8c918efd8ee66279f98ee85e7c97b24"}]}