)]}'
{"test/unit/common/test_utils.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":15343,"name":"Tim Burke","email":"tburke@nvidia.com","username":"tburke"},"change_message_id":"59d8edc9d6c1c17b90e125c8689fc0c4c1720ecd","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":290,"context_line":"        self.assertIs(True, utils.Timestamp(ts) \u003d\u003d ts)  # sanity"},{"line_number":291,"context_line":"        self.assertIs(False, utils.Timestamp(ts) !\u003d utils.Timestamp(ts))"},{"line_number":292,"context_line":"        self.assertIs(False, utils.Timestamp(ts) !\u003d ts)"},{"line_number":293,"context_line":""},{"line_number":294,"context_line":"    def test_no_force_internal_no_offset(self):"},{"line_number":295,"context_line":"        \"\"\"Test that internal is the same as normal with no offset\"\"\""},{"line_number":296,"context_line":"        with mock.patch(\u0027swift.common.utils.FORCE_INTERNAL\u0027, new\u003dFalse):"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"7a5de9d1_f94aaa82","line":293,"updated":"2016-01-28 18:15:35.000000000","message":"Do we want to make similar assertions for the actual ordering? I really would\u0027ve expected @total_ordering to provide a __ne__, so now I feel extra paranoid.\n\n  self.assertIs(True, utils.Timestamp(ts) \u003c\u003d ts)\n  self.assertIs(False, utils.Timestamp(ts) \u003c ts)\n  self.assertIs(True, utils.Timestamp(ts) \u003e\u003d ts)\n  self.assertIs(False, utils.Timestamp(ts) \u003e ts)","commit_id":"a1776b9c1f23fbd604114b377434e4269d2f1a2e"}]}