)]}'
{"test/unit/obj/test_server.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"46d4de590a5da0d2296e626da6aaeda147ecf075","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":4717,"context_line":"            headers\u003d{\u0027X-Timestamp\u0027: normalize_timestamp(test_time - 100),"},{"line_number":4718,"context_line":"                     \u0027X-If-Delete-At\u0027: str(int(test_time))})"},{"line_number":4719,"context_line":"        resp \u003d req.get_response(self.object_controller)"},{"line_number":4720,"context_line":"        # FIXME: Should it fail as 409????"},{"line_number":4721,"context_line":"        self.assertEqual(resp.status_int, 412)"},{"line_number":4722,"context_line":""},{"line_number":4723,"context_line":"        # And new request should fail because older object found but it"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":2,"id":"5aef4532_3a562c5c","line":4720,"updated":"2016-03-09 18:17:09.000000000","message":"I think 412 is OK to return. There was no conflict because the precondition failed.\n\nThat said, I wouldn\u0027t argue that 409 was wrong.\n\nMaybe we should discuss in irc for other opinions and then either fix or remove the FIXME","commit_id":"ce5de26b254f5fd0450df469b1c81a88c9bcd6ee"}]}