)]}'
{"doc/source/deployment_guide.rst":[{"author":{"_account_id":964,"name":"Anne Gentle","email":"annegentle@justwriteclick.com","username":"annegentle"},"change_message_id":"4a9c3f38d7688097836aa408fa66ee5d5c857249","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":969,"context_line":"XFS, we highly recommend thorough testing."},{"line_number":970,"context_line":""},{"line_number":971,"context_line":"For distros with more recent kernels (for example Ubuntu 12.04 Precise),"},{"line_number":972,"context_line":"we recommend using the default settings when formatting::"},{"line_number":973,"context_line":""},{"line_number":974,"context_line":"    mkfs.xfs /dev/sda1"},{"line_number":975,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"AAAAPn%2F%2FhYY%3D","line":972,"updated":"2013-06-28 15:59:44.000000000","message":"Let them know the default settings by putting (256) after default settings. Just makes it less of a black box.\n\nAlso previously the doc said \"creating the XFS partition\" rather than \"formatting\" -- seems like a big change in action? Which are you really doing (or are you doing both, formatting and creating the partition?)","commit_id":"31c3bc27a75b37a66e9bcb37e01890ca78b2696a"},{"author":{"_account_id":597,"name":"Pete Zaitcev","email":"zaitcev@kotori.zaitcev.us","username":"zaitcev"},"change_message_id":"8cc3bd53de7cb04dbacd2c191dc889cad5cc618e","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":977,"context_line":"are allocated and used.  Using the default inode size no longer has an"},{"line_number":978,"context_line":"impact on performance."},{"line_number":979,"context_line":""},{"line_number":980,"context_line":"For distros with older kernels (for example Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid), "},{"line_number":981,"context_line":"some settings that can dramatically impact performance. We recommend the"},{"line_number":982,"context_line":"following when formatting the XFS partition::"},{"line_number":983,"context_line":""}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":2,"id":"AAAAPn%2F%2FhRk%3D","line":980,"updated":"2013-06-28 16:29:40.000000000","message":"hehe a trailing space","commit_id":"31c3bc27a75b37a66e9bcb37e01890ca78b2696a"},{"author":{"_account_id":597,"name":"Pete Zaitcev","email":"zaitcev@kotori.zaitcev.us","username":"zaitcev"},"change_message_id":"e486456af17ad420067e69a3c8fff5c09f7075a2","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":979,"context_line":"impact on performance."},{"line_number":980,"context_line":""},{"line_number":981,"context_line":"For distros with older kernels (for example Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid),"},{"line_number":982,"context_line":"some settings that can dramatically impact performance. We recommend the"},{"line_number":983,"context_line":"following when creating the file system::"},{"line_number":984,"context_line":""},{"line_number":985,"context_line":"    mkfs.xfs -i size\u003d1024 /dev/sda1"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"AAAAPn%2F%2Fg08%3D","line":982,"updated":"2013-06-28 18:59:20.000000000","message":"Drop \"that\".","commit_id":"0309e4daa9fe472f7f3d2368234593daf8b7294b"},{"author":{"_account_id":6198,"name":"Peter Portante","email":"peter.a.portante@gmail.com","username":"peter-a-portante"},"change_message_id":"5d0ec642e619f115dd67a90f0decd3d63debfffc","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":996,"context_line":""},{"line_number":997,"context_line":"We also recommend the following example mount options when using XFS::"},{"line_number":998,"context_line":""},{"line_number":999,"context_line":"    mount -t xfs -o noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,logbufs\u003d8 /dev/sda1 /srv/node/sda"},{"line_number":1000,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1001,"context_line":"For a standard swift install, all data drives are mounted directly under"},{"line_number":1002,"context_line":"/srv/node (as can be seen in the above example of mounting /def/sda1 as"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"AAAAPn%2F%2FgyY%3D","line":999,"updated":"2013-06-28 19:21:17.000000000","message":"We also have to be careful with logbufs\u003d8 and nobarrier. \n\nIf using RAID (really RAID 6) then nobarrier should be considered based on the array controller (do you have battery backed cache, etc.). In those cases, being sure the array controller has battery backed cache and the individual disks are not caching will gain ones performance back a bit.\n\nFor logbufs\u003d8 this can expose folks to data loss, right?","commit_id":"0309e4daa9fe472f7f3d2368234593daf8b7294b"},{"author":{"_account_id":917,"name":"Chuck Thier","email":"cthier@gmail.com","username":"cthier"},"change_message_id":"89d58d3d75e48b0d3a4bebe2795b4c3347a754e5","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":996,"context_line":""},{"line_number":997,"context_line":"We also recommend the following example mount options when using XFS::"},{"line_number":998,"context_line":""},{"line_number":999,"context_line":"    mount -t xfs -o noatime,nodiratime,nobarrier,logbufs\u003d8 /dev/sda1 /srv/node/sda"},{"line_number":1000,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1001,"context_line":"For a standard swift install, all data drives are mounted directly under"},{"line_number":1002,"context_line":"/srv/node (as can be seen in the above example of mounting /def/sda1 as"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-rst","patch_set":4,"id":"AAAAPn%2F%2Fgt8%3D","line":999,"in_reply_to":"AAAAPn%2F%2FgyY%3D","updated":"2013-06-28 19:53:31.000000000","message":"I thought logbufs\u003d8 is default now anyways?  I hadn\u0027t touched the mount options yet, because I haven\u0027t had a chance to go through and audit.  I plan to do that when I get back from vacation.  I will rearrange it a bit so that it doesn\u0027t seem like this statement goes with RAID","commit_id":"0309e4daa9fe472f7f3d2368234593daf8b7294b"}]}