)]}'
{"test/unit/common/test_wsgi.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":4608,"name":"Kota Tsuyuzaki","email":"bloodeagle40234@gmail.com","username":"tsuyuzaki-kota"},"change_message_id":"e9faa1cb88b5f0f0428b83c058803adccf3a5930","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1403,"context_line":"                    modify_func):"},{"line_number":1404,"context_line":"                app \u003d wsgi.loadapp(conf_file, global_conf\u003d{})"},{"line_number":1405,"context_line":"            exp \u003d swift.common.middleware.catch_errors.CatchErrorMiddleware"},{"line_number":1406,"context_line":"            self.assertIsInstance((app, exp), app)"},{"line_number":1407,"context_line":"            exp \u003d swift.common.middleware.healthcheck.HealthCheckMiddleware"},{"line_number":1408,"context_line":"            self.assertIsInstance((app.app, exp), app.app)"},{"line_number":1409,"context_line":"            exp \u003d swift.proxy.server.Application"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"ba5da102_2d3a45ce","line":1406,"updated":"2016-10-26 10:33:31.000000000","message":"Probably you need to change here and following tuple format to pass the py27 gate. it seems like as:\n\n self.assertIsInstance(app, exp, app)\n\nreference: http://docs.python.jp/2/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertIsInstance\n\nThat is at least compatible with current code. And if we could add more improvement, the last arg (we set app here) is for the message if the assertion failed so that IMO, it\u0027s better to use more obvious message.","commit_id":"f794e9c63ead1d8e35a439b407e00134d48a08b3"}]}