)]}'
{"swift/common/swob.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7233,"name":"Matthew Oliver","email":"matt@oliver.net.au","username":"mattoliverau"},"change_message_id":"105e7e63bc54f31b51283086c3e83deff81b4665","unresolved":false,"context_lines":[{"line_number":541,"context_line":"        :param length: length of the underlying content"},{"line_number":542,"context_line":"        \"\"\""},{"line_number":543,"context_line":"        # not syntactically valid ranges, must ignore"},{"line_number":544,"context_line":"        if length is None or not self.ranges or not self.ranges:"},{"line_number":545,"context_line":"            return None"},{"line_number":546,"context_line":"        all_ranges \u003d []"},{"line_number":547,"context_line":"        for single_range in self.ranges:"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"5f7c97a3_9fe46410","line":544,"range":{"start_line":544,"start_character":29,"end_line":544,"end_character":63},"updated":"2018-06-06 06:52:35.000000000","message":"well for one, not self.ranges is already checked. To be honest, I\u0027m not sure what the self.ranges \u003d\u003d [] is doing in the old version, cause I\u0027d assume it would have been caught by the second or.","commit_id":"31ee9edeca8a22028176a378cf2c9acf856660f3"}]}