)]}'
{"swift/obj/reconstructor.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7233,"name":"Matthew Oliver","email":"matt@oliver.net.au","username":"mattoliverau"},"change_message_id":"cdee367220a1aa0d990a81a4117e6e1826644853","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":620,"context_line":"                (time.time() - self.start))"},{"line_number":621,"context_line":""},{"line_number":622,"context_line":"    def _emplace_log_prefix(self, worker_index, devices):"},{"line_number":623,"context_line":"        self.logger.set_prefix(\"[worker %d/%d pid\u003d%s devices\u003d%s] \" % ("},{"line_number":624,"context_line":"            worker_index + 1,  # use 1-based indexing for more readable logs"},{"line_number":625,"context_line":"            self.reconstructor_workers,"},{"line_number":626,"context_line":"            os.getpid(),"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":1,"id":"89d0f67b_401e2294","line":623,"updated":"2021-01-09 22:01:14.000000000","message":"How does this look with a really large set devices? Does it become unweildly? I guess mostly it would be \u0027all\u0027\n\nThe other option would be to print an info or debug line with worker details on start of the worker run.. then we get the info each worker each cycle, without potentually having a giant prefix on every worker log line.\n\nLove the idea","commit_id":"511c7247879642d7672d12f895582fda91a1b582"}]}