)]}'
{"test/unit/obj/test_expirer.py":[{"author":{"_account_id":7847,"name":"Alistair Coles","email":"alistairncoles@gmail.com","username":"acoles"},"change_message_id":"c6618233a5ff77d52a46d9c77b92581b48c45086","unresolved":true,"context_lines":[{"line_number":1268,"context_line":"        # _setup_a_bunch_of_tasks to calculate the"},{"line_number":1269,"context_line":"        # \"best_num_iter_before_delete\"; but this assertion works quite well"},{"line_number":1270,"context_line":"        # even with a stub_shuffle \u003d None"},{"line_number":1271,"context_line":"        self.assertLess(num_iter_before_delete, worst_num_iter_before_delete)"},{"line_number":1272,"context_line":""},{"line_number":1273,"context_line":"    def test_run_once_unicode_problem(self):"},{"line_number":1274,"context_line":"        requests \u003d []"}],"source_content_type":"text/x-python","patch_set":6,"id":"7c91aa3c_3bdee418","line":1271,"updated":"2024-04-09 18:30:13.000000000","message":"the default shuffle could be a third test case with assertion that it\u0027s num_iter_before_delete lies between ordered and reversed (see follow-on patch)","commit_id":"239ae4ee57207cd840d94ca24a3dca7621897a06"}]}